Next Article in Journal
Statement of Peer Review
Previous Article in Journal
Tomographic Evaluation of the Efficacy of Three Rotary Retreatment Systems for Retreatability of Root Canals Obturated with Two Different Techniques
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Assessment of 222Rn Activity in Bottled Water from Baghdad and Its Radiological Impact †

by
Muhannad Kh. Mohammed
1,*,
Rahim Jaafar Aziz
1,
Nabeel H. Ameen
2,
Huda N. Karkosh
3 and
Mohammed Sh. Naji
1
1
Department of Science, College of Basic Education, Mustansiriyah University, Baghdad 14022, Iraq
2
Iraqi Atomic Energy Commission, Baghdad P.O. Box 765, Iraq
3
Office of Inspection and Licenses, Iraqi Radioactive Sources Regulatory Authority, Baghdad 14022, Iraq
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the International Conference on Recent Advances in Science and Engineering, Dubai, United Arab Emirates, 4–5 October 2023.
Eng. Proc. 2023, 59(1), 247; https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2023059247
Published: 6 May 2024
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of Eng. Proc., 2023, RAiSE-2023)

Abstract

:
This study investigates the radiological impact of 222Rn activity concentrations in bottled drinking water sourced from local markets in Baghdad, Iraq. Utilizing the solid-state nuclear track detector (SSNTD) technique with CR-39 detectors, 222Rn activity concentrations were measured in 25 bottled water samples. Concentrations ranged from 1.5 to 11.12 Bq/L, with an average value of 4.58 Bq/L. To assess the potential health risks, the annual effective dose (AED) due to 222Rn ingestion was calculated. The potential radiation doses ranged from 3.21 × 10 6 Sv/y for infants to 1.17 × 10 5 Sv/y for adults. These values are significantly lower than the established dose limit of 0.1 × 10 3 Sv/y, thereby indicating a negligible radiological risk to consumers. The study also explored the correlation between total dissolved solids (TDS) and 222Rn concentrations, finding a direct relationship between higher TDS values and elevated 222Rn levels. The findings of this research contribute to the understanding of natural radionuclide levels in drinking water and their implications for public health.

1. Introduction

Drinking water serves as an essential resource for sustaining life but also acts as a matrix that often contains substances detrimental to human health, including radionuclides. Natural radionuclides are frequently detected in drinking water owing to their release from rock formations via processes such as erosion and dissolution [1]. Uranium-238 (238U) is the most abundant element in rocks and serves as a parent element for several progeny radionuclides, notably radon-222 (222Rn). Radon-222 is an odorless, tasteless, and colorless noble gas with a half-life of 3.8 days. The primary health risks associated with 222Rn arise from internal exposure, primarily through inhalation. Once inhaled, 222Rn and its decay products (218Po, 214Po) can reach bronchiolar cells, where emitted alpha particles may induce DNA damage, potentially leading to carcinogenesis [2,3,4,5,6]. The World Health Organization (WHO) acknowledged radon gas as the second leading cause of lung cancer following tobacco smoking in 2009 [7]. Similarly, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classified radon as a Group 1 carcinogen in 1998 [8].
In addition to inhalation, ingestion serves as another route for internal exposure to 222Rn. Although 222Rn is the most frequently occurring radionuclide in water, its solubility in water is relatively low and inversely proportional to temperature [9,10]. Water usage liberates radon into indoor air; consequently, nearly 90% of the 222Rn dose from drinking water originates from inhalation rather than ingestion [11]. Ingestion of radon-laden water also poses direct health risks, as 222Rn can irradiate the sensitive cells of the intestinal tract before being rapidly expelled from the body [12,13,14,15]. Despite the potential hazards, no studies have definitively established a link between ingested radon and gastrointestinal tumors [16].
The present study aims to quantify the activity concentration of 222Rn in bottled drinking water in Baghdad city and to assess the potential health impacts through the evaluation of the annual effective dose due to radon ingestion.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Collection and Analysis

Bottled drinking water samples, with capacities ranging from 0.25 to 20 L, were procured from local markets in the Baghdad governorate in January 2022. These samples were classified based on their trade names, and a total of 25 such samples were analyzed. Each sample was assigned a unique code and stored in a refrigerator until the time of analysis.

2.2. Measurement of Radon Concentration

For assessing cumulative radon concentration, time-integrated passive radon dosimeters equipped with CR-39 solid-state nuclear track detectors (SSNTDs) were utilized. The CR-39 detector employed in this study is composed of polyallyl diglycol carbonate and has a thickness of 1.5 mm and an effective area of 2.38 cm 2 . This detector fits into the groove of the dosimeter, which also features slits that permit the diffusion of radon gas while excluding other contaminants. Alpha particles emitted from the decay of 222Rn and its daughter isotopes interact with the CR-39 film, inducing molecular bond damage. This damage manifests as sub-microscopic tracks on the surface of the film. Under specific chemical or electrochemical etching conditions, these latent tracks can be enlarged to become permanent, observable tracks. The number of these tracks is quantified using an optical amplification readout device, and the equilibrium radon concentration is subsequently calculated using an appropriate Equation (1) [17].
C R n = N T N B A × k × T
In this equation, C R n represents the equilibrium radon concentration in Bq/m3; N T is the total number of tracks registered in the CR-39 detector; N B signifies the background tracks in the detector; A is the effective area of the CR-39 detector in cm2; k is the calibration factor of the CR-39 detector in Tr·cm−2/kBq·m−3·h; and T is the effective exposure time in hours (960 h, 40 days).

2.3. Measurement of Total Dissolved Solids

The concentrations of total dissolved solids (TDS) in the samples were determined using a TDS meter.

2.4. Estimation of 222Rn Annual Effective Dose (AED)

The annual effective dose (AED) serves as the metric for assessing the radiological effects of radon exposure. The calculation of the AED requires consideration of the yearly water consumption rates. Based on reference [12], average water consumption rates were categorized into three age groups: infants, children, and adults. These were further distributed across six subgroups (G1–G6), as listed in Table 1. The AED is computed using the following Equation (2) [12,18]:
AED = A × C × DCF
In this equation, A represents the radon activity concentration in water (Bq/L); C denotes the average water consumption rate (L/year); and DCF is the dose coefficient factor, valued at 3.5 × 10 9 Sv / Bq .

3. Results and Discussion

The study analyzed 222Rn concentrations in 25 bottled water samples available in local markets in Baghdad, along with their total dissolved solids (TDS) values. As summarized in Table 2, the 222Rn concentrations varied significantly among the samples. The highest concentration of 11.12 Bq/L was observed in a sample from the Royal brand, while the lowest of 1.5 Bq/L was found in an Aquafina-branded sample.
The mean 222Rn concentration across all samples was 4.58 Bq/L. These variations are likely influenced by the distinct geological characteristics of the water sources, affecting the radioactive content in the soil and rocks. Notably, all measured 222Rn concentrations were below the regulatory threshold of 100 Bq/L [12]. Correlation was observed between samples showing high radioactivity and elevated TDS values, indicating a direct relationship between the concentration of dissolved solids and 222Rn radioactivity levels. This observation was further substantiated by data from the Tigris River in Baghdad, which displayed a 222Rn level of 42 Bq/L and a TDS value of 472 ppm. Hence, water purification methods that effectively remove solid materials could potentially reduce 222Rn levels. To evaluate the potential health risks associated with long-term consumption of the analyzed bottled water, annual effective doses (AEDs) were calculated using Equation (2). The AED results, categorized by age and further divided into six groups (G1–G6), are presented in Table 3. The highest dose recorded was 1.17 × 10 5 Sv/y for adults aged over 17 years, and the lowest was 3.21 × 10 6 Sv/y for infants aged 0–1 years. All calculated doses were found to be well below the reference dose level of 0.1 × 10 3 Sv/y [19], thereby indicating negligible health risks under standard conditions. Figure 1 further elucidates these dose assessments, revealing the highest and lowest dose rates to be 2.84 × 10 5 Sv/y and 1.05 × 10 6 Sv/y, attributed to the Royal and Aquafina brands, respectively.

4. Conclusions

The present study examined the radiological implications of 222Rn concentrations in bottled drinking water sold in local markets in Baghdad. The 222Rn concentrations in the analyzed samples ranged from 1.5 to 11.12 Bq/L, all of which were below the regulatory reference value of 100 Bq/L [12]. Thus, the sampled bottled waters do not pose a significant radiological hazard to consumers. The annual effective dose (AED) due to 222Rn ingestion was calculated to evaluate its impact on different age groups. For an average activity concentration of 4.58 Bq/L, the potential radiation doses ranged from 3.21 × 10 6 Sv/y for infants (0–1 years) to 1.17 × 10 5 Sv/y for adults (>17 years). These doses are well below the reference dose limit of 0.1 × 10 3 Sv/y [19], indicating a negligible risk to public health. Furthermore, the study evaluated the correlation between 222Rn activity concentrations and total dissolved solids (TDS) values in bottled water samples.
The findings suggest that samples with higher 222Rn concentrations generally also exhibit higher TDS values, implicating the dissolved solids as a contributing factor to elevated 222Rn levels.

Author Contributions

Methodology and writing—original draft preparation, M.K.M.; validation, R.J.A.; formal analysis, N.H.A.; investigation, H.N.K.; resources, M.S.N.; data curation, R.J.A.; writing—review and editing, N.H.A.; visualization, H.N.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All the data used in the experiment has been made available in the present article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Ivanovich, M.; Harmon, R.S. Uranium-Series Disequilibrium, 2nd ed.; Clarendon Press: Oxford, UK, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  2. Durante, M.; Grossi, G.; Napolitano, M.; Pugliese, M.; Gialanella, G. Chromosome-Damage Induced by High-Let Alpha-Particles in Plateau-Phase C3h 10t1/2 Cells. Int. J. Rad. Biol. 1992, 62, 571–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. National Research Council. Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation (BEIR VII); National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2006.
  4. Gillmore, G.K.; Crockett, R.G.M.; Przylibski, T.A. IGCP Project 571: Radon, Health and Natural Hazards. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 2010, 10, 2051–2054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lorenzo-González, M.; Torres-Durán, M.; Barbosa-Lorenzo, R.; Provencio-Pulla, M.; Barros-Dios, J.M.; Ruano-Ravina, A. Radon exposure: A major cause of lung cancer. Expert Rev. Respir. Med. 2019, 13, 839–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. UNSCEAR. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation, Biological Mechanisms of Radiation Actions at Low Doses; United Nations: New York, NY, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  7. World Health Organization (WHO). WHO Handbook on Indoor Radon: A Public Health Perspective. In WHO Guidelines Approved by the Guidelines Review Committee; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  8. International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). Man-made Mineral Fibres and Radon. In IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans; IARC: Lyon, France, 1988; Volume 43, pp. 1–300. [Google Scholar]
  9. UNSCEAR. United Nations Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation, Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation; Report to the General Assembly with Scientific Annexes, Annex A; United Nations: New York, NY, USA, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  10. Schubert, M.; Paschke, A.; Lieberman, E.; Burnett, W.C. Air–Water Partitioning of 222Rn and its Dependence on Water Temperature and Salinity. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 3905–3911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. UNSCEAR. United Nations Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation, Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation, Report to the General Assembly with Scientific Annexes, Annex B; United Nations: New York, NY, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  12. La Verde, G.; Artiola, V.; D’Avino, V.; La Commara, M.; Panico, M.; Polichetti, S.; Pugliese, M. Measurement of Natural Radionuclides in Drinking Water and Risk Assessment in a Volcanic Region of Italy, Campania. Water 2021, 13, 3271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. World Health Organization (WHO). Guidelines for Drinking Water Quality, 4th ed.; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  14. Khursheed, A. Doses to systemic tissues from radon gas. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 2000, 88, 171–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Crawford-Brown, D.J. The biokinetics and dosimetry of radon-222 in the human body following ingestion of groundwater. Environ. Geochem. Health 1989, 11, 10–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Kendall, G.M.; Smith, T.J. Doses to organs and tissues from radon and its decay products. J. Radiol. Prot. 2002, 22, 389–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Liu, C.; Ma, H.; Zeng, Z.; Cheng, J.; Li, J.; Zhang, H. Measurements of Radon Concentrations Using CR-39 Detectors in China JinPing Underground Laboratory (2015–2016). arXiv 2018, arXiv:1806.06567. [Google Scholar]
  18. Oudah, O.N.; Al-Hamzawi, A.A. Measurement of Radon Concentrations in Mineral Water of Iraqi Local Markets Using RAD7 Technique. Nat. Environ. Pollut. Technol. J. 2020, 19, 1973–1976. [Google Scholar]
  19. Chen, J. Evaluation of radioactivity concentrations from the fukushima nuclear accident in fish products and associated risk to fish consumers. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 2013, 157, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Results of dose assessment for different populations groups and for different bottled water types.
Figure 1. Results of dose assessment for different populations groups and for different bottled water types.
Engproc 59 00247 g001
Table 1. The average consumption rate of water for each age category, as reported in reference [12].
Table 1. The average consumption rate of water for each age category, as reported in reference [12].
Age CategoryAge GroupAge Range (Years)Consumption Rate (L/year)
InfantsG10–1200
G21–2260
ChildrenG32–7300
G47–12350
G512–17600
AdultsG6>17730
Table 2. 222Rn and TDS concentrations in investigated bottled mineral water samples.
Table 2. 222Rn and TDS concentrations in investigated bottled mineral water samples.
No.Trade Name222Rn Concentration (Bq/L)TDS (ppm)
1Aquafina1.572
2Al-Reem7.23122
3Alwarith3.4594
4Pearl2.478
5Alwarith5.4102
6Safa8.69138
7Zamzam7.66137
8Royal11.12145
9Life6.495
10Alkafil2.4286
11Rawand3.1591
12Alhayaa2.8592
13Crystal6.72115
14Alraawia3.1187
15Mina5.46121
16Life2.1789
17Roshna3.8284
18Veneza1.7276
19Jadisiyah1.9582
20Wafr Aljbal6.2105
21Sana4.7102
22Alhilwa5.1109
23Alaiqmar4.76112
24Alwaha2.9583
25Yanabie allawjayn3.7492
Average ± σ : 4.58 ± 2.42    100.36 ± 20.11
Range: 1.5–11.12    72–145
Table 3. Results of dose assessment for different population groups.
Table 3. Results of dose assessment for different population groups.
Age CategoryAge GroupAge (years)Consumption Rate (L/year)Dose Rate (Sv/y)
InfantsG10–1200 3.21 × 10 6
G21–2260 4.17 × 10 6
ChildrenG32–7300 4.81 × 10 6
G47–12350 5.61 × 10 6
G512–17600 9.62 × 10 6
AdultsG6>17730 1.17 × 10 5
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mohammed, M.K.; Aziz, R.J.; Ameen, N.H.; Karkosh, H.N.; Naji, M.S. Assessment of 222Rn Activity in Bottled Water from Baghdad and Its Radiological Impact. Eng. Proc. 2023, 59, 247. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2023059247

AMA Style

Mohammed MK, Aziz RJ, Ameen NH, Karkosh HN, Naji MS. Assessment of 222Rn Activity in Bottled Water from Baghdad and Its Radiological Impact. Engineering Proceedings. 2023; 59(1):247. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2023059247

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mohammed, Muhannad Kh., Rahim Jaafar Aziz, Nabeel H. Ameen, Huda N. Karkosh, and Mohammed Sh. Naji. 2023. "Assessment of 222Rn Activity in Bottled Water from Baghdad and Its Radiological Impact" Engineering Proceedings 59, no. 1: 247. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2023059247

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop