Next Article in Journal
A Review of the Mechanisms of Bacterial Colonization of the Mammal Gut
Previous Article in Journal
Reference Genes for Expression Analyses by qRT-PCR in Enterobacter cancerogenus
Previous Article in Special Issue
First Isolation and Characterization of Bacteria from the Core’s Cooling Pool of an Operating Nuclear Reactor
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Insights into the Impact of Physicochemical and Microbiological Parameters on the Safety Performance of Deep Geological Repositories

by
Mar Morales-Hidalgo
*,
Cristina Povedano-Priego
,
Marcos F. Martinez-Moreno
,
Miguel A. Ruiz-Fresneda
,
Margarita Lopez-Fernandez
,
Fadwa Jroundi
* and
Mohamed L. Merroun
Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2024, 12(5), 1025; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12051025
Submission received: 23 April 2024 / Revised: 6 May 2024 / Accepted: 17 May 2024 / Published: 19 May 2024

Abstract

:
Currently, the production of radioactive waste from nuclear industries is increasing, leading to the development of reliable containment strategies. The deep geological repository (DGR) concept has emerged as a suitable storage solution, involving the underground emplacement of nuclear waste within stable geological formations. Bentonite clay, known for its exceptional properties, serves as a critical artificial barrier in the DGR system. Recent studies have suggested the stability of bentonite within DGR relevant conditions, indicating its potential to enhance the long-term safety performance of the repository. On the other hand, due to its high resistance to corrosion, copper is one of the most studied reference materials for canisters. This review provides a comprehensive perspective on the influence of nuclear waste conditions on the characteristics and properties of DGR engineered barriers. This paper outlines how evolving physico-chemical parameters (e.g., temperature, radiation) in a nuclear repository may impact these barriers over the lifespan of a repository and emphasizes the significance of understanding the impact of microbial processes, especially in the event of radionuclide leakage (e.g., U, Se) or canister corrosion. Therefore, this review aims to address the long-term safety of future DGRs, which is critical given the complexity of such future systems.

1. Introduction

The increasing production of radioactive waste due to the extensive use of nuclear power has underscored the urgency for developing reliable strategies for the long-term containment of these hazardous materials. In response to this emerging challenge, the deep geological repository (DGR) model has been proposed for the secure confinement of radioactive waste [1]. This system entails depositing nuclear waste in metallic canisters underground at a depth of approximately 500 m within stable geological formations. Depending on the country, the materials used in the various barriers, as well as other physico-chemical characteristics related to the design of the repository, may vary. Table 1 presents the main information concerning the materials and their properties to be expected in future repositories of the principal national companies involved in the development of DGRs. In many countries including Spain, Switzerland, Belgium, Finland, France, and Canada, the canisters will be surrounded by compacted clay materials selected for their ability to provide mechanical, hydraulic, and thermal protection [2,3]. Specifically, bentonite clay has been recognized as a suitable material to use as both artificial and natural barriers within the DGR systems due to its exceptional properties. The utilization of bentonite from various locations has been extensively investigated as a buffer material. Notable examples include MX80 from the United States, FEBEX from Spain, FoCa from France, and GMZ from China. These formations particularly exhibit low permeability (resulting in a decrease in groundwater filtrations), mechanical support (ensuring stability), swelling capacity (facilitating the self-sealing of cracks), thermal conductivity (preventing overheating), and ion exchange capacity (enabling radionuclide retention) [4]. In addition, bentonite presents optimal compaction properties, which not only significantly contribute to improving the mechanical support, thermal conductivity, and sealing properties mentioned previously, but may also influence the viability of the bentonite microbial communities. Highly compacted bentonite blocks are thought to prevent microbial growth [5]. Despite this, recent studies have demonstrated microbial stability in compacted bentonite under conditions that mimic a DGR [6]. Thus, these microorganisms are expected to maintain their viability and metabolic activity within such a harsh system.
Microorganisms have the potential to affect their surrounding environment and, consequently, the safety of DGRs through various processes. These include the generation of gases, corrosion of metal canisters [20], alteration of redox conditions [21], transformation of mineral clays [22], and interaction with radionuclides [23,24]. A wide variety of physical (temperature, radiation, groundwater filtration, bentonite compaction, etc.), chemical (gaseous compounds, corrosion, presence/absence of oxygen, etc.), and biological factors (microbial activity) may compromise the performance of both bentonite barriers and their microbial communities. Given all these considerations, evaluating how these factors may compromise the safety of these storage facilities is of crucial importance to ensure the secure disposal of these highly polluting and hazardous waste materials, which threaten the health of living organisms.
This review provides a comprehensive analysis of the most recent advances in studies predicting and evaluating environmental conditions that would affect the performance and safety of future deep geological repository systems. A special focus is given to the effect of radiation, temperature, bentonite compaction and various biotic and abiotic factors on the microbial behavior in bentonite barriers.

2. Effect of Radiation

The DGR concept is designed almost exclusively for the management of so-called high-level waste (HLW). HLW includes radioactive waste with substantial amounts of long-lived alpha and beta–gamma emitters, making this waste highly radioactive and capable of generating high temperatures. Most of this type of waste includes spent nuclear fuel (SF) generated by nuclear power plants. The other minority contains waste resulting from the reprocessing of SF, as well as residues from research, industry, and mining [25,26]. One of the main concerns regarding HLW is the presence of elements with very long half-lives, spanning hundreds of thousands of years [27]. Hence, examining the impact of radiation, particularly gamma radiation due to its high penetrative ability, on different barriers of future repositories has been of paramount importance from the outset to guarantee long-term safety. The measurement of radiation energy absorbed by a material is quantified as the absorbed dose, which is expressed in the international system of units (SI) as Gray (Gy). Ionizing radiation can interact with matter through various mechanisms and thus alter its properties [28]. This section will only focus on the effects of gamma radiation on copper (Cu) corrosion, bentonite stability, and microbial presence and survival. In general, the absorbed doses at the surface level of the canister are expected to be relatively low, though this will vary depending on the DGR model (Table 1). Furthermore, as the distance from the radiation source increases, the received radiation doses decrease progressively. Consequently, the radiation levels experienced within the canister will be higher than those within the engineered bentonite barrier, and the radiation within the latter will be higher than that received by the host rock. Despite the relatively low radiation doses experienced in the various barriers, some studies have been conducted on the impact of gamma radiation on canister corrosion and the bentonite barrier to prevent potential leaks.

2.1. Copper Corrosion

Gamma radiation primarily arises from the decay of the fission product Cs-137, which possesses a relatively short half-life of 30 years. Consequently, the intensity of this radiation is expected to decrease relatively quickly following the closure of the repository [29]. Its impact on copper corrosion would be mainly indirect, occurring through its reaction with water and the subsequent decomposition into oxidizing (HO· and H2O2) and reducing agents (H·, and H2), which is known as the radiolysis process [30]. Of all the species generated, the most concerning are hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and the hydroxyl radical (HO·), as they are the most thermodynamically stable and have higher standard reduction potential than copper [31]. In addition, radiolysis of humid air can also generate other reactive species such as NOx and HNO3 [32]. Björkbacka et al. [33] reported that absorbed doses of gamma radiation caused corrosion in copper under conditions of anoxic aqueous solutions, both uniformly and locally. The main corrosion products were copper (I) oxide (Cu2O) along with a small fraction of copper (II) oxide (CuO). In recent years, several studies have been focused on examining the corrosion products on the surface of copper canisters following exposure to gamma radiation doses. However, a challenge persists as most of these studies have been conducted at doses significantly higher than those expected in the repository. This discrepancy arises from the challenge of conducting experiments under realistic repository conditions, where radiation exposure rates will be very low but extended over time. Consequently, the corrosion magnitude observed in these studies surpasses that predicted by simulation models [34,35,36]. The research by King et al. [37] demonstrated that to induce significant corrosion concerns, a threshold of 100 Gy/h would need to be surpassed. Additionally, they suggested that dose values below this threshold could marginally decrease corrosion, possibly due to the formation of a passive protective oxide layer that many metals develop to resist corrosion.

2.2. Bentonite Stability

Due to the dispersal capability of gamma radiation, potential effects could occur on the buffer barrier as well [38,39]. This review will specifically focus on its impact on the chemical and mineralogical composition of bentonite clay, as well as its cation exchange capacity [39]. Therefore, one of the essential requirements for its utilization as a buffer and sealing material would be the rheological and chemical stability when exposed to ionizing radiation and even in the presence of radionuclides in the worst-case scenario of a waste leak [40,41,42]. Radiation can impact the clay structure and, consequently, its properties, through processes such as inducing amorphization and affecting the sorption capacity of elements. This would compromise the long-term stability of this material and, thus, the safety and integrity of the repository [43]. However, most experiments clearly indicate that the amorphization of bentonite can be ruled out under radiation levels anticipated in future DGRs, as this phenomenon only occurs at significantly higher levels. For instance, Sorieul et al. [44] reported that a radiation dose of at least 1011 Gy is required for clay to become amorphous. Additionally, Galamboš et al. [38] concluded that bentonite from Slovakia exhibited no changes or very insignificant ones in their structural properties after exposure to gamma radiation. Nevertheless, in a study conducted in 2011 by Holmboe et al. [45], the effects of γ radiation on the ability of MX80 bentonite to retain radionuclides were tested. They observed a notable decrease in Co2+ sorption in irradiated samples but not in Cs+ which may suggest that this form of irradiation could have altered the surface characteristics relevant to the sorption of this radionuclide. Additionally, bentonite is notable for its high content of accessory minerals. It has been observed that the distribution of these minerals could also impact the behavior of this clay, as they may dissolve and alter the properties under radiation conditions. On the other hand, other studies have demonstrated that the stability of bentonite against radiation depends on the water content, attributed to the radiolysis effect occurring within its pores. Gu et al. [46] noted that the stability of bentonite increases when the water content is lower, as it results in a lower number of products from the radiolysis of water. More recent studies, such as that of Chikkamath et al. [47], have corroborated this effect by finding that doses of up to 12 kGy/h had no effect on Fe(II)-clay powder samples. This outcome was probably due to the fact that the irradiated samples were dry, resulting in a lower impact of water radiolysis. Indeed, it has already been highlighted the contradictory results concerning the alterations in the surface reactivity of bentonite when subjected to radiation [39]. Whilst some authors have reported an increase in the ion exchange capacity, others have observed the opposite effect. Accordingly, current knowledge continues to advance in this field to establish the impact of this radiation on buffer clay materials.

2.3. Microbial Viability

Radiation would also affect the microbial communities present in the future repositories by altering their structure, viability, and activity. To compare radiation sensitivity of microorganisms, the term decimal reduction dose (D10) is used, which is defined as the radiation dose (in kGy) necessary to reduce a microbial population by 90% of its total number [48]. As previously mentioned, the effect of radiation depends on the perceived dose, which will vary depending on various factors including the distance from the radiation source, the barrier model, the type of radionuclide contained, and its lifetime [49]. Not only does radiation itself cause changes and damage at the cellular level, but the reactive oxygen species (ROS) resulting from the radiolysis process will also affect most biomolecules. One of the most prominent forms of damage is to DNA, causing DNA strand breaks, base changes, mutations, etc. [50]. In general, microorganisms respond to such damage with different defense mechanisms to repair as much as possible. These mechanisms include DNA repair systems, production of antioxidant enzymes to cope with reactive oxygen species (ROS), and antioxidant processes involving increased intracellular concentrations of inorganic solutes and pigments [51]. The response of microorganisms to radiation varies amongst strains, as sensitivity depends on factors such as cellular water content, DNA size and structure, antioxidant, and DNA repair systems, as well as the ability to develop resistant cell forms, amongst others. The latter is particularly important, as several studies have shown that the tolerance of bacterial spores to radiation is significantly higher than that of vegetative cells [48]. Furthermore, this sensitivity also depends on environmental conditions: water activity, level of desiccation, presence or absence of oxygen, etc. For instance, many studies reported that conditions such as a dry environment, lack of oxygen, and low temperatures enhance radiation resistance [52,53,54]. The literature on bacterial species highly resistant to radiation is quite limited; however, two strains are referenced and have been well studied for their high resistance to radiation, namely Deinococcus radiodurans, with a tolerance of up to 17 kGy [55], and Kineococcus radiotolerans [56,57]. In general, the majority of strains capable of resisting certain doses tend to be extremophiles, exhibiting tolerance to other extreme conditions of temperature, desiccation, or high concentration of salts [49]. On the other hand, regarding the bentonite bacterial community, some studies have reported Bacillus, Acinetobacter, Desulfosporosinus, and Clostridium to also be resistant to radiation doses [58,59].
Nevertheless, in the future repositories, microorganisms will not only face radiation as a stress factor. Therefore, more research is needed to understand the evolution of microbial communities under the combination of various repository conditions.

3. Effect of Bentonite Dry Density and Microbial Activity on Bentonite Performance as an Engineered Barrier in DGRs

HLW will be contained within canisters crafted from corrosion-resistant materials such as copper, stainless steel, or “novel materials”, which are typically subjected to very low corrosion rates. Regarding novel metal canisters, the advanced coatings and alloys (e.g., Ni or Ti alloy and ceramic coated metals) are expected to delay corrosion, but their degradation is not ruled out when subjected to hydration, irradiation, and temperature. The different metallic canisters will be encased in a protective buffer of compacted bentonite securely stored deep underground, at depths of several hundred meters, thus ensuring a robust containment system for the safe disposal of the nuclear waste [60].
Bentonite is rich in a swelling mineral, typically montmorillonite, which is a key component with a notable swelling ability [61,62]. Montmorillonite, belonging to the smectite mineral group, acts as an ion exchanger. It features a stable negatively charged silicate layer with an interlayer hosting mobile counter cations and water molecules. The predominant counter ions are often Na+ and Ca2+, resulting in Na- and Ca-bentonite, respectively, although other ions may also be present [63]. High quality commercial bentonite typically consists of over 80% montmorillonite. However, this content varies significantly amongst different commercial bentonites, ranging from 60% to more than 80% [64]. During the canister deposition process, the bentonite buffer is composed of low-water-content (10–17%) bentonite blocks. Strategic slots will be positioned between the bentonite, the canister, and the rock, enabling a smooth lowering of canisters and blocks into deposition holes. Upon contact with the groundwater, bentonite will expand and undergo mechanical pressure until it attains the intended full compaction density of 2 kg/m3 and a relatively low water content of approximately 26%, leading to the sealing of the repository [6]. In this way, the buffer materials will allow an effective sealing of any potential radiation leakage pathways and maintain the mechanical integrity of the canister, thereby enhancing the safety of the DGR [61,65]. Consequently, bentonite has emerged as the preferred choice for the final setup of the disposal due to its advantageous mechanical support, ensuring stability for canisters. Additionally, its low permeability mitigates groundwater infiltration, whilst its high ion exchange capacity aids in the retention and retardation of radionuclides in case of a system breach [61,66,67]. Furthermore, its high plasticity and swelling capacity facilitate the self-sealing of canister cracks, whilst its good thermal conductivity and optimal properties for compaction enhance its suitability for repository applications [4,68,69]. Across different waste disposal concepts, the target swelling pressure is set at a minimum of 5 MPa, requiring a dry clay density of >1.6 g/cm3 [70]. A primary concern associated with the bentonite buffer involves the potential interaction of microorganisms with minerals, leading to weathering, dissolution, and the formation of secondary minerals [71]. A high bentonite density is thought to exert an inhibiting effect on the activity of the natural bacterial populations within bentonite clay [6,72]. The inhibition of bacterial growth and the spore germination is likely due to limited pore space, low water activity, and high swelling pressure. These findings that are supported by many previous studies [71], indicating the restricted microbial activities under 1.6 g/cm3 or higher, were further corroborated by the low extractability of solid-phase bentonite natural organic matter [72]. Although these studies were conducted for a duration of up to 18 months, the authors extrapolate their results to the expected time frame required for a DGR to reach full saturation, which ranges from 50 to 5000 years [71]. These outputs suggest that bentonite compacted to densities higher than this threshold may exhibit a long-term greater stability and has significant practical implications for the safety assessment of the DGRs.
Nevertheless, there are many prokaryotes adapted to survive in high pressure environments, as well as the endospore of any spore-forming bacteria, which have been reported to not completely disappear after 15 months under the repository conditions [73]. Therefore, a continuous evaluation of microbial activity and diversity in such a challenging environment is essential for the safety assessments of the DGR concept. In recent years, numerous studies have investigated the behavior of allochthonous bacteria in highly compacted bentonite (Figure 1), as well as the cultivation of microbes derived from the bentonite itself [6,64,74,75]. For instance, Jalique et al. [76] identified Gram-positive spore-forming bacteria in highly compacted bentonite and inferred that the formation of spores might enhance bacterial survival in the challenging conditions of this environment.
In addition, according to Bengtsson and Pedersen [77], a high density of bentonite buffers in future DGRs will significantly reduce the risk for sulfide production in the buffer and the concomitant corrosion of copper canisters by limiting microbial activity. However, even under these harsh conditions, certain anaerobic bacterial groups, notably sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) and iron-reducing bacteria (IRB), have been reported with the potential to be active within the harsh conditions of highly compacted bentonite [6,73]. The adverse effects of their activity encompass the initiation of microbiologically influenced corrosion (MIC) processes, the conversion of Fe(III) to Fe(II) in smectite (the primary mineral in bentonite), and the dissimilatory reduction in sulfate, thiosulfate, and sulfur to sulfide by sulfide-producing bacteria (SPB) as a main concern for the safety of a geological disposal, since sulfide is a corrosive agent for metal waste canisters, and, in particular, for copper canisters [78]. In line with this, Povedano-Priego et al. [75] reported that high bacterial diversity was detected in the acetate-treated Spanish bentonite compacted at 1.5 and 1.7 g/cm3 densities after 24 months of anoxic incubation. Amongst the identified microorganisms in the highly compacted bentonite, there were bacteria involved in the sulfur (e.g., Desulfuromonas and Desulfosporosinus) and iron (e.g., Thiobacillus and Rhodobacter, Geobacillus) biogeochemical cycles, as well as those (e.g., Delftia and Stenotrophomonas) enriched by the presence of acetate, as the electron donor. In addition, in their study, Martinez-Moreno et al. [68] reported on the survival of SRB in compacted Spanish bentonite (1.7 g/cm3) with a copper disc placed in the core, after one-year anoxic incubation at 30 °C, although their growth was stimulated by the presence of electron donors (lactate and acetate) and sulfate (electron acceptor). However, in a more realistic scenario, simulating a post-closure DGR phase, highly compacted bentonite blocks (1.7 g cm−3) with high-purity copper disks in the core, and incubation at a high temperature (60 °C), the number of SRB was drastically reduced, even when electron donors/acceptor were added to the system, and only Pseudomonas as well as some bacterial groups adapted to extreme conditions were able to survive [69]. A step forward to the improved understanding of the influence of higher temperatures on the bentonite bacterial communities and radionuclide migration through the engineered barriers is crucial to determine the validity of bentonite buffer safety functions.
Of particular concern is the biotransformation of smectite into illite through Fe(III) bio-reduction, which stands out as one of the most alarming processes [79]. An attack of iron-reducing bacteria to the ferric iron component within bentonite buffers is expected to diminish the swelling capacity of the clay [65]. This, in turn, may create conditions that stimulate the microbial activity within the buffer, enhancing the diffusion of sulfide and potentially leading to the release of radionuclides [80,81]. Nevertheless, many studies have demonstrated that no illitization process was detected in highly compacted bentonite under different conditions relevant to DGRs, and different temperature incubation (both at 30 °C and 60 °C) for one year at anoxic conditions, thus confirming the mineralogical stability of the bentonite and its crucial role as effective barrier for future DGRs [68,69,75].
Additional research involving extended incubation periods (e.g., spanning at least 10 years), providing suitable electron donors (e.g., lactate and acetate) alongside terminal electron acceptors such as sulfate and Fe(III) are imperative to resolve remaining key issues about the roles of SRB and IRB and whether they can accelerate the degradation of bentonite-based buffers and thus threaten, the safety of the whole repository system. In general, conducting both short- and long-term experiments, along with modeling efforts, is essential to showcase the resilience of the DGR waste management concept. These endeavors are crucial for enhancing comprehension and predictability regarding the influence of fundamental processes and their interconnections. Such attempts pave the way for advancing our understanding throughout the long-term management of radioactive waste.

4. Effect of Radionuclides on the Diversity and Viability of Bentonite Microbial Communities

HLW is primarily composed of spent fuel from nuclear power plants, which is the most hazardous residue due to its radioactivity, which may persist for up to 1000 years. This waste contains a high number of radionuclides including uranium (in the form of enriched UO2 pellets with 235U), transuranic elements (plutonium and minor actinides), fission products (e.g., Be, Ce, and Se), and activation products (e.g., Ni, Mo, and Sr) [82]. Hence, the radionuclides present in HLW can pose challenges to the environment and public health due to their emission of radioactivity, in the form of beta particles.
The mobility of uranium in the environment depends on its speciation and redox state. In natural environments, U(VI) under aerobic conditions exists as UO22+, hydroxyl complexes, and uranyl carbonate at pH below 2.5, 6.5, and 7, respectively [83]. The oxidized forms of U carry a higher number of positive charges, leading to increased solubility and mobility, thereby increasing its toxicity towards microbial cells. Conversely, U(IV) remains insoluble and exhibits lower toxicity in anaerobic environments [23]. The toxicity of selenium also correlates with its oxidation state, with oxyanions (selenate [Se(VI)] and selenite [Se(IV)]) representing the most toxic forms of Se due to their high solubility and mobility, causing harmful effects in the environment. On the other hand, metallic selenium [Se(0)] and selenides [Se(-II)] in terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems exhibit low solubility and mobility, thus presenting lower toxicity levels [84,85].
All the scenarios contemplated for the DGRs suggest that the release of radionuclides, during the long-term repository period, may be inevitable due to natural evolutionary processes and water contacting the source term. The consequence is that the radionuclides could migrate through the repository barriers and ultimately reach the biosphere [86]. The leakage of radionuclides from the canisters to the bentonite (the engineered barrier) could impact the diversity and viability of the microorganisms naturally inhabiting this material. As such, these microorganisms may influence the speciation and mobility of the radionuclides, thus limiting their migration into the biosphere.

4.1. Uranium

Most of the toxicity associated with uranium is due more to its chemistry as a heavy metal rather than its radiotoxicity. The toxic effects vary among plants, animals, and microorganisms, consequently leading to differing mechanisms of action [87]. In microorganisms, uranium toxicity results in reduced cell viability and metabolic activity, along with increased DNA damage. Additionally, such toxicity has been associated with elevated membrane permeability, oxidative stress, and temporary RNA degradation [88]. However, microorganisms inhabiting metal-contaminated environments may possess an increased tolerance to heavy metals and radionuclides and develop diverse mechanisms for their immobilization such as biosorption, biomineralization, bioreduction, and bioaccumulation [89].
Povedano-Priego et al. [90] demonstrated the effect of uranium on the microbial diversity of various bentonite microcosms treated with uranyl nitrate and glycerol-2-phosphate (G2P). In those microcosms incubated under aerobic conditions, significant U effects were observed, leading to the enrichment of microorganisms with ability to immobilize U through U phosphate biomineralization process, given the aerobic condition of the environment. Phosphatases play a key role in the precipitation of uranium. Production of inorganic phosphates by intracellular phosphatase, stimulated by U(VI), enhances the immobilization of uranium and its precipitation as uranium phosphates, thereby reducing the toxicity of U(VI) to cells [90,91]. Interestingly, Amycolatopsis was identified in high abundance in G2P-uranium-treated bentonite microcosms. This bacterium has been proven to efficiently immobilize U as uranium phosphates through phosphatase activity induced by the presence of G2P (Figure 2; [91]). Additionally, these actinobacteria can remove uranium through its biosorption by carboxyl, amide, and hydroxyl groups [92]. Similarly, Bacillus, a bacterial genus renowned for its biomineralization and uranium biosorption capabilities, has been identified in the uranium-treated bentonites [93]. For instance, Merroun et al. (2005) reported that the S-layer, a protein envelope encasing Bacillus sphaericus JG-A12, exhibited the capacity to sequester uranium and other heavy metals owing to the presence of carboxyl and phosphate groups [94]. Additionally, in Bacillus sp. dw-2, the presence of uranium precipitates in the form of small needles has been observed [95]. The denitrifying Pseudomonas genus has been distributed with high relative abundance in different bentonite samples [6,85,96], which is well-known for their capacity to interact with uranium through the different mechanisms that contribute to U immobilization. The study of Povedano-Priego et al. discovered the presence of Desulfovibrio within the bacterial community of G2P-uranium-treated bentonite under anoxic conditions [96]. The capacity of members of this genus to use glycerol as electron donors had earlier been reported [97]. In this case, the oxidation of glycerol, acetate, or lactate to CO2 is coupled to the reduction in U(VI) to U(IV), producing the immobilization of uranium as uraninite [98]. This capacity allows Desulfovibrio to survive in uranium-contaminated sediments [99], and waters [100].
As in bacteria, the fungal community in bentonite is also affected by the presence of uranium in the environment. This group of microorganisms has not been extensively studied, and there is still a lack of understanding regarding its behavior within the framework of DGRs. In fact, Povedano-Priego et al. found that the fungal diversity in bentonites treated with uranyl nitrate was completely different from U unamended samples, with Penicillium and Fusarium exhibiting the highest relative abundances in the presence of this radionuclide. High-angle annular dark-field (HAADF) analyses revealed the ability of F. oxysporum B1, isolated from uranium-treated microcosms, to generate U-phosphate phases, thereby aiding in the immobilization and detoxification of uranium [101]. Table 2 shows different microorganisms found in bentonite samples with the capacity to interact with this heavy metal.

4.2. Selenium

Selenium plays a crucial role as a micronutrient essential for various biological systems, including antioxidant pathways. Nevertheless, whilst beneficial at low concentrations, Se contamination and subsequent bioaccumulation can lead to environmental and human health risks. Se is toxic for bacteria due to its incorporation into sulfur-containing proteins [102]. The presence of Se(IV) impacts the microbial diversity of bentonite, as described by Povedano-Priego et al. They observed that the relative abundance of the archaea Methanosarcina decreased significantly in the selenite-treated bentonite microcosms induced by the toxic effect of Se(IV) [85]. However, Methanosarcina recovered when the selenite was reduced in the bentonite by members of a bacterial consortium added in the microcosms. The presence of selenium in bentonite may also influence the bacterial communities, leading to an increase in the abundance of bacteria capable of tolerating the metalloid, developing diverse detoxification mechanisms, such as Pseudomonas, Stenotrophomonas, and Desulfosporosinus, amongst others [85]. Several studies have described the reduction in oxidized and soluble forms of Se (selenite and selenate) to insoluble Se(0) in bacteria, such as Bacillus [103], Shewanella [104], Stenotrophomonas [105], and Pseudomonas [106]. The reduction process could be carried out through different enzymatic pathways mediated by different reductase activities such as nitrite, sulfite, fumarate, and selenite reductases [23]. In addition, the Se(IV) reduction could be mediated by molecules containing reduced thiol groups (-SH) such as glutathione (GSH). Pinel-Cabello et al. (2021) detected an increase in the presence of glutathione reductase, glutathione-disulfide reductase, and thioredoxin-disulfide reductase in Stenotrophomonas bentonitica BII-R7 culture treated with Se(IV), demonstrating that the mechanism for Se(IV) reduction is activated in presence of this toxic element [107]. The produced Se(0) by bacteria is accumulated in the extracellular space and form Se nanoparticles (SeNPs) with different allotropy; amorphous, monoclinic, and trigonal selenium (Figure 3; [108]). The transformation of amorphous to monoclinic and trigonal Se may be mediated by proteins excreted by bacteria, although the specific process is still unknown [109]. This process has also been observed in bentonite microcosms treated with selenite and spiked with a bacterial consortium after 6-month anoxic incubation [85]. It was demonstrated for the first time that Se transformation generating Se nanostructures composed by the trigonal phase, the most stable form, was detected in a ternary system (bentonite, microorganisms, and Se). Table 2 summarizes some of the autochthonous bentonite microorganisms that have been reported with the ability to interact with this metalloid selenium.
Table 2. Microorganisms found in bentonite samples with the capacity to interact with heavy metals and metalloids.
Table 2. Microorganisms found in bentonite samples with the capacity to interact with heavy metals and metalloids.
MicroorganismTaxonomic AffiliationInteraction MechanismMetalReference
Amycolatopsis ruaniiActinomycetota (Bacteria)BiomineralizationUranium[90]
Bacillus sphaericusBacillota (Bacteria)BiosorptionUranium[94]
Bacillus sp.Bacillota (Bacteria)Biosorption and bioaccumulationUranium[95]
Desulfovibrio vulgarisPseudomonadota (Bacteria)BioreductionUranium[98]
Fusarium oxysporumAscomycota (Fungi)BiomineralizationUranium[101]
Bacillus selenitireducensBacillota (Bacteria)BioreductionSelenium[103]
Shewanella oneidensisPseudomonadota (Bacteria)BioreductionSelenium[104]
Stenotrophomonas bentoniticaPseudomonadota (Bacteria)BioreductionSelenium[105]
Pseudomonas seleniipraecipitansPseudomonadota (Bacteria)BioreductionSelenium[106]

5. Copper Corrosion under Repository Conditions

Extensive research has been conducted on the corrosion of canister materials under controlled experimental conditions. Therefore, it is necessary to extrapolate the experimental data to take into account the fluctuating evolution of chemical, mechanical, and redox conditions that will occur during the repository post-closure period. Based on the report of Landolt et al. [14] regarding the NAGRA design concept, four phases have been identified to occur on the canister surface from the time of repository closure up to millions of years: (1) in the first tens of years, an initial phase will develop characterized by dry and oxic conditions, with high temperatures; (2) second oxic and unsaturated phase would last the first few hundreds of years; (3) third phase of more advanced hundreds of years, wherein oxygen would have already been consumed and an anaerobic phase with unsaturated conditions would be established; and (4) the cold, anoxic, and long-lasting final phase with fully saturated conditions would be established. The evolution and fluctuations in temperature and oxygen concentration projected over the years after the closure of future nuclear repositories are illustrated in Figure 4 [110].
According to the various phases anticipated after repository closure, the primary factors expected to play a significant role in the corrosion of copper canisters would include: the presence/absence of oxygen, radiation (Section 2), and microbiologically influenced corrosion (MIC) [21]. With regard to oxygen, its presence will be limited to the first years of the repository, as it will be consumed by bacterial activity and by the oxidation of minerals present in the different barriers [111,112]. The most plausible reaction expected to occur is the one that results in copper oxide(I) according to the following equation: 4Cu + O2 → 2Cu2O [21]. However, when these oxic phases come to an end after the total consumption of O2, the environment becomes completely anaerobic. In the context of this reducing environment, copper corrosion processes are primarily expected to result from water reduction, wherein copper would react with water molecules, leading to the formation of copper(I) oxides (Cu2O) alongside H2 [21,113]. However, one of the most critical sources of corrosion would be due to microbial activity. Sulfate-reducing bacteria are frequently responsible for MIC damage, primarily due to the abundance of sulfate in anaerobic environments. This corrosion process can occur through two different routes: an indirect route known as chemical MIC (CMIC), where corrosion is caused by the products resulting from microbial metabolism; and/or a direct route, known as electrical MIC (EMIC), where the transfer of electrons from the metal directly interfaces with the bacteria and it requires biofilm formation [114,115]. The formation of biofilms on the surface of the canister is highly improbable in a repository concept that includes the direct contact of bentonite backfill with the canister [12]. Additionally, copper lacks the energetic potential for SRB to utilize it as a source of electrons for generating energy through dissimilatory sulfate reduction (DSR). Therefore, between the two pathways, CMIC would predominantly engage SRB since this bacterial group utilizes sulfate, not copper, as final electron acceptor in the respiratory process (dissimilatory sulfate reduction). This allows them to obtain energy by releasing HS (bisulfide) or H2S (sulfide), depending on the pH value [20,116]. The copper would corrode due to these biogenic sulfides resulting in the formation of copper sulfides as described by the following equation: 2Cu + HS + H+ → Cu2S (s) + H2 (g) [117] (Figure 5). Deep underground water sources might contain elevated levels of dissolved sulfate ions, which could support the sustenance of these SRB. Additionally, nutrients could be sourced from natural organic materials within the clay, fracture fluids, or neighboring minerals [21,118].
To date, there is robust evidence indicating that the requisite conditions for facilitating localized corrosion phenomena, such as pitting, are unlikely to take place in a post-closure nuclear repository using copper as a corrosion barrier [119,120,121,122]. Furthermore, it should be noted that this sulfur flow would occur during the later stages of the DGR, once water saturation has taken place. By this time, it is anticipated that O2 consumption will have been completed, thus bringing an end to the oxic corrosion mentioned earlier. Consequently, when sulfide becomes available, the copper would probably encounter a layer composed of copper oxides or hydroxides already formed, rather than pure copper. Smith et al. [123] documented the conversion of Cu2O to Cu2S under aqueous sulfide conditions (HS-), and similar reactions involving other copper species such as Cu+ or CuCl2 have been reported in other studies. Therefore, the significance of these transformations lies in the fact that under repository conditions, the incoming sulfide will interact with corrosion products such as copper oxides or dissolved copper that have already formed. However, this corrosion product layer prior to sulfide exposure can serve as a barrier, redirecting sulfide to react with the pre-existing corroded material rather than with new canister sections [21].

6. Effect of Oxygen, Gasses, and Nutrients on the Microorganisms

With the final closure of the repository, the initial oxic conditions would lead to a complete anoxic environment with time. Initially, oxygen can be consumed by different processes including corrosion of the canister [14], reduced components of the rocks and backfill [124], oxidation of bentonite Fe containing minerals [125], and microbial activity in bentonite [125]. The necessary time to re-establish the anoxic conditions depends on the above-mentioned processes, ranging from months to thousands of years [12]. For example, Giroud et al. [125] considered gas exchange with bentonite pore water and adsorption on mineral surfaces as the most important processes controlling O2, with it being fully consumed after only a few months. However, according to Wersin et al. [126], anoxic conditions would be re-established in the buffer after a period ranging between 7 and 290 years, whilst Grandia et al. [127] predicted that aerobic conditions may prevail for more than 5000 years in the absence of O2 consumption in the buffer. As far as the microbial involvement in the process is concerned, several authors have confirmed the short term of O2 consumption [12]. Apart from the oxygen trapped in the pore spaces, the radiolysis of humid air or water also produces oxidizing species that will increase the general metal corrosion rates, as previously mentioned [128]. The effect of the radiolysis of water on corrosion, however, can be significantly attenuated in the absence of oxygen [129].
Moreover, a significant volume of other gasses would be generated with time in the DGR which may affect the long-term safety of the system by shifting the containment functions of engineered and natural barriers through over-pressurization of the repository. In addition, the hydraulic and mechanical properties of engineered barriers and host rock might be altered [130,131]. Gas would be generated through several abiotic processes such as anaerobic corrosion of metal canister and ferrous components in the engineered barrier system, biotic degradation of organic materials and radiolysis of water [130]. Hydrogen is expected to be the dominant gas generated in a deep geological repository [132,133] and could also potentially act as a carrier for radioactive gaseous species (e.g., H-3, C-14, Rn-222, etc. [134,135]). The formation of H2 by anaerobic corrosion of metals may further contribute to gas generation (such as CH4, H2S or CO2), as H2 can be used as an electron donor in microbial processes [136]. Soluble organic degradation products (e.g., formic acid, acetic acid or methanol, among others) also have the potential to enhance corrosion and form aqueous complexes with radionuclides, which may affect their mobility and release from the repository [137]. Methane and carbon dioxide are generated as a result of microbiological degradation of organic materials, which could lead to overpressure in the repository and migration of water-borne radionuclides in fractures of crystalline bedrock and may drive the transport of radionuclide contaminated groundwater to the biosphere [137]. In addition, irradiated metals and waste materials may contain radionuclides, which can be volatilized to the biosphere in the form of gas [138]. Although it is assumed that gas-generating materials are not altered prior to the operational and post-closure repository phase, the environmental conditions which control the gas production (e.g., temperature, concentration of reactants, availability of catalysts, salinity, pH, redox potential) may increase or decrease it. Generally, production, transport and consumption of gas and water in a closed deep geological repository are coupled processes. Gas and water transport affect the production/consumption of water and gas, e.g., by controlling the gas pressure and the availability of water for corrosion and degradation reactions, whilst water and gas production/consumption will influence the movement of water and gas [139].
Another important factor to consider is the extreme oligotrophic conditions deep underground in the repository. Life in the continental deep biosphere is broadly constrained by energy and nutrient availability [140]. However, it has been demonstrated that deep biosphere microorganisms are active, and able to influence the environmental conditions and material integrity in deep geological repositories [93,141]. These extreme and deep ecosystems foster diverse, yet cooperative, communities adapted to this setting [142]. Metabolic cooperation, via syntropy between sub-surface microbial groups, is critical for the survival of the whole community under the oligotrophic conditions that dominate in the sub-surface, where microbial ecosystems are typically supported by H2. Methanogens such as Methanosarcina, Methanoculleus, and Methanocella, and sulfate reducers like Desulfosporosinus, Desulfovibrio, and Desulfotomaculum, and the respective energy processes, are thought to be the dominant players [143]. Furthermore, the main source of microorganisms in the bentonite appears to be the bentonite itself rather than the host rock or its pore water. The number of microorganisms is predicted to increase until full saturation of bentonite is reached and would remain at stable numbers for decades [141]. Interestingly, Burzan et al. [73] observed the growth of aerobic heterotrophs instead of anaerobes in the bentonite despite the nominally anoxic conditions. The microbial activity of anaerobic microorganisms (most commonly sulfate-reducing bacteria) can lead to corrosion of the metallic waste canister materials [73], and the production of gasses such as methane, hydrogen sulfide, and nitrogen [144], affecting the long-term safety of the repository. Therefore, taxonomically and metabolically diverse microorganisms developed syntrophic partnerships to actively overcome all the difficulties imposed by the environmental conditions in the deep sub-surface, and thus, affect the safety of the DGRs for nuclear waste.

7. Effect of Temperature

7.1. Impact of Temperature Evolution on Nuclear Repository Barriers

The waste disposal temperature will be shaped by the layout, design, and decay of radionuclides within the spent nuclear fuel bundles in the DGR [112]. Then, the subsequent evolution of the temperature over the storage time would be predominantly determined by the thermal behavior of the canisters due to the heat generated by the decay of the radionuclides. Different models based on the DGR designs of each country predict a gradual increase in the temperature in the canister’s surface, reaching a maximum peak of ≈100 °C within the first decades (Table 1). Additionally, this generated heat would dissipate into the nearby engineering barriers and the host rock. The temperature evolution is a key factor that may alter the properties and stability of engineered barriers such as the bentonite sealing material or the metal canisters. Since the DGR environment would not be sterile, the temperature evolution could affect the microbial communities within the repository.
Elevated temperatures can compromise the mineralogical, mechanical, and index characteristics of bentonite. Kale and Ravi [145] reported that, with an increase in the temperature, the liquid limit (the water content where the soil starts to behave as a liquid) of the bentonite decreases. This is also affected by the clay content, since the higher the clay content, the higher percentage reduction in the liquid limit. This decrease in the liquid limit, with a temperature rise, would affect the plasticity (ability to undergo deformation without cracking) index in the same way. Moreover, the specific gravity (density of a substance in comparison to the density of water) of smectite soil was found to be reduced by the increase in the temperature. Based on the results of Tan et al. [146], if the temperature reaches >100 °C, the specific gravity will decrease gradually up to 400 °C followed by a slow decrease up to 800 °C. Additionally, the maximum dry density increases with an increase in the temperature [145]. Exposure to high temperatures results in several physical and chemical transformations in clay, such as mineral composition/decomposition, reduction in moisture layers, and alterations in mass and density, contributing to the degradation of its structural integrity [147]. The water content is influenced by the temperature since water layers begin to reduce their size when the clay is in contact with heat [148]. The moisture layers can be removed when the temperature is between 100 °C and 110 °C (absorbed moisture) leading to the collapse of the interlayer pore space. The optimum moisture content is less affected at <100 °C, whilst up to 400 °C, a drastic decrease can be observed. Subsequently, this loss of water affects the macro and microporosity of the clay minerals and their plasticity. The physicochemical properties of bentonite can be also affected by an increase in temperature. Estabragh et al. [149] showed a gradual decrease in Na+ concentration, linked with an increase in temperature, affecting the cation exchange capacity (CEC) of the bentonite, whilst a pH decrease was evidenced when the temperature was >150 °C. When clay is heated, the bonds at the edges of the interlayer units, especially in montmorillonite, will be broken due to the presence of weak Van der Waals forces. At a mineralogical level, one of the main concerns related to elevated temperatures is the irreversible smectite-to-illite transformation that affects the swelling capacity of the bentonite [150]. This process, known as illitization, involves the chemical alteration of expandable smectite into non-expandable illite. This change is typically prompted by elevated temperature exposure (100–200 °C) over a long period of time [151]. The process of illitization may be initiated by potassium ions, potentially originating from the clay K-feldspars, which integrate into the smectite layers and form covalent bonds with oxygen [150].
Moreover, in this context, published studies show that shifts in temperature have a negative effect on metal canister corrosion affecting the corrosion kinetics and the solubility of mineral phases in contact with the canisters [12]. The corrosion rates of passive metals are remarkably low (around 0.01 µm/year). However, the integrity of passive self-forming surface films faces threats from localized corrosion, including pitting and crevice corrosion, with temperature playing an important role in initiating corrosion [152]. A suitable material for canisters must preserve its structural integrity, corrosion resistance, and radiation shielding capabilities at temperatures > 100 °C, potentially up to an upper threshold of 300 °C (Table 1). Hence, the concern that sensitized microstructures susceptible to localized corrosion may be produced, compromising the mechanical integrity of the canisters, does not appear to be an important issue under the temperatures expected in a DGR. Due to the heat on the surface of the canisters, the initial humidity in the bentonite would be distributed to cooler areas. This would result in dry and uniform oxidation on the surface of the canisters. Studies conducted by Stoulil et al. [153] have shown that high temperatures compact the corrosion layers on the surface of the canisters, which slightly reduces the corrosion rate. Schlegel et al. [154] showed that under fluctuating temperature conditions (85 °C with a drop to 25 °C, and then 85 °C again), steel corrosion presented areas of extensive corrosion with depressions filled with corrosive products. This fluctuating temperature produced a high rate of corrosion compared to when the temperature was static at 85 °C. Moreover, in conditions where the temperature varies, the formation of carbonates, chlorides, sulfides, Fe-silicates, and magnetite as corrosive products are common. Schlegel et al. [154] determined that significant effects of low-temperature fluctuations include accelerated metal oxidation compared to the formation of corrosive products [155], growth of microbial colonies leading to biofilms or Fe-sulfide generation, and a decrease in air tightness. However, with a rise in temperature, corrosive product deposition intensifies, which in turn decelerates the corrosion process. In the case of copper, the main corrosive agent under anaerobic conditions is hydrogen sulfide produced by SRB [77]. Martinez-Moreno et al. [69] showed that these bacteria do not exhibit viability at high temperatures (60 °C). Therefore, no precipitates related to copper anaerobic corrosion (CuxS) were observed, with copper oxide being the main corrosive product detected.

7.2. Impact of Temperature Evolution on Microorganisms

One of the aspects to consider when ensuring the stability of a DGR is the effect that microorganisms will have on the different containment barriers under repository-relevant conditions [156]. The elevated temperature could affect the microbial communities within the DGR, especially those naturally occurring in the bentonite. Martinez-Moreno et al. [69] proved that high temperature (60 °C) reduces the microbial diversity and the number of SRB in compacted bentonite after a one-year incubation. Moreover, at this temperature, whilst some aerobic bacteria (e.g., Aeribacillus) showed growth capacity at 60 °C, certain anaerobic bacteria (IRB and SRB) did not. The activity absence of IRB and SRB at 60 °C, or higher temperatures, is of particular interest related to the MIC of metal canisters previously mentioned, as this fact would retard the MIC on the canister surface. Additionally, Bartak et al. [157] found a decline in microbial activity as temperature rose, and that thermal treatment significantly impacted the microbial community composition within the bentonite, identifying various thermophilic species (e.g., Caldinitratiruptor and Brockia) or thermotolerant spore-forming genera (e.g., Thermincola and Bacillus). Moreover, they determined a threshold temperature of 90 °C to inhibit microbial activity and growth across all the tested bentonite suspensions. Furthermore, previous research has demonstrated that bacteria can withstand extreme environments either through the formation of spores (e.g., Desulfosporosinus and Desulfotomaculum), or by entering into a dormant state, such as desiccated cells [158,159]. Since high temperatures turn the bentonite/canister interface into a dry environment, bacteria could face water loss enhanced by the strong affinity of the bentonite, which draws water away from the cells causing cell inactivation and inducing spore formation. Moreover, the formation of biofilms and sporulation are well known tactics used by bacteria to withstand desiccation [160]. Once the temperature starts to be cooler during the anoxic period (Figure 4), bacteria can recover their cell viability under favorable conditions [69,159].

8. Limitations, Challenges, and Opportunities

Ensuring the long-term stability of future nuclear waste repositories requires very comprehensive studies based on multidisciplinary approaches, combining engineering, chemistry, physics, mathematics, geology, and microbiology. The effect of mineralogical and biogeochemical parameters (e.g., clay mineralogy and compaction density, pore water chemistry, etc.) on the stability of DGR barriers have been well studied. However, very few studies were conducted to investigate the combined impact of different DGR physicochemical parameters (e.g., radiation, temperature) on the presence and activity of microbes. Incorporating these microbiological data in the geochemical models is of great importance to achieve an accurate prediction of the long-term stability and safety of the different DGR barriers. Nevertheless, this topic is in its infancy and close collaborations between experimentalists (microbiologists, chemists, mineralogists, physicists, etc.) and modelers should be conducted to fill the gaps. Introducing bacterial activity into long-term mathematical models presents a challenge due to the inherent complexity of biological systems and the interactions between their components (e.g., complexity and diversity of bacterial behaviors, dynamic and nonlinear interactions, variability and heterogeneity within the bacterial community, etc.). Therefore, the principal challenge facing the scientists working in this field is the complexity of these studies as they require taking into consideration the physiochemical and microbiological relevant conditions for future DGR (temperature, radiation, water activity, etc.) and a long-term duration of the research projects. Therefore, in order to simulate a more realistic scenario, this kind of studies should be conducted at the underground laboratories such as Mont Terri Rock (Switzerland), Hades (Belgium), Äspö Hard Rock (Sweden), and Meuse/Haute Marne (France). The access to such laboratories is, however, very limited. Advance in this field of study is crucial and should be based on the communication between experts in the relevant disciplines. This will enable the collection of comprehensive, realistic data and the development of accurate strategies to guarantee the long-term safety of these systems.

9. Conclusions

The aim of this review is to outline how various conditions evolving over the lifespan of a nuclear waste repository can impact the properties of engineered barriers (metal canister and backfill/seal barrier). Key parameters influencing the safety of these repositories include radiation, temperature fluctuations, bentonite compaction density, and abiotic/biotic factors (e.g., oxic/anoxic atmosphere, nutrient-enriched groundwater seepage, gas production), amongst others. We have also discussed the impact of microbial processes on the safety performance of DGR barriers. Despite the harsh conditions involved within a DGR that may impact the survival and viability of microorganisms, some autochthonous microbes from bentonite and those that will be accidentally introduced due to human activity may be inhabiting there. Hence, understanding the interaction between microorganisms and the barriers is crucial since they are able to completely modify the surrounding environment. For this reason, research on the microbiology of repositories has been increasing in recent years. Moreover, within this review, we have highlighted the behavior of autochthonous bentonite microorganisms in response to radionuclide leaks from the nuclear waste, such as U or Se, underscoring the capacity of certain microbes to retard their mobility and migration through bioimmobilization processes. In this context, understanding the conditions that could impact the different barriers is crucial for ensuring the long-term safety of future DGRs, since these systems will be highly complex.

Author Contributions

M.M.-H., F.J. and M.L.M. planned the work. M.M.-H. was the main contributor to the manuscript. The other co-authors (M.L.M., F.J., M.F.M.-M., C.P.-P., M.L.-F. and M.A.R.-F.) also assisted in writing certain sections of the manuscript. The final version was edited and revised by all the authors. All the authors contributed to the article and approved the final submitted version. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work has been supported by the grant PID2022-138402NB-C21 funded by MICIU/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and by ERDF/EU. In addition, it was supported by the grant FPU20/00583 to the first author from the Spanish Government.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the assistance of Angela Tate for the revision of the English language.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Status and Trends in Spent Fuel and Radioactive Waste Management; Nuclear Energy Series No. NW-T-1.14; International Atomic Energy Agency: Vienna, Austria, 2022; ISSN 1995-7807. Available online: https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/Publications/PDF/PUB1963_web.pdf (accessed on 1 January 2022).
  2. Xu, Y.; Zeng, Z.; Lv, H. Temperature dependence of apparent thermal conductivity of compacted bentonites as buffer material for high-level radioactive waste repository. Appl. Clay Sci. 2019, 174, 10–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Bajestani, M.S.; Nasir, O.; Oh, W.T. Properties of Bentonite-Based Sealing Materials during Hydration. Minerals 2023, 13, 1412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. García-Romero, E.; María Manchado, E.; Suárez, M.; García-Rivas, J. Spanish bentonites: A review and new data on their geology, mineralogy, and crystal chemistry. Minerals 2019, 9, 696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Stroes-Gascoyne, S.; Hamon, C.J.; Maak, P.; Russell, S. The effects of the physical properties of highly compacted smectitic clay (bentonite) on the culturability of indigenous microorganisms. Appl. Clay Sci. 2010, 47, 155–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Engel, K.; Ford, S.E.; Binns, W.J.; Diomidis, N.; Slater, G.F.; Neufeld, J.D. Stable microbial community in compacted bentonite after 5 years of exposure to natural granitic groundwater. MSphere 2023, 8, e00048-23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Villar, M.V.; Pérez del Villar, L.; Martín, P.L.; Pelayo, M.; Fernández, A.M.; Garralón, A.; Cuevas, J.; Leguey, S.; Caballero, E.; Huertas, F.J.; et al. The study of Spanish clays for their use as sealing materials in nuclear waste repositories: 20 years of progress. J. Iber. Geol. 2006, 32, 15–36. [Google Scholar]
  8. 7º Plan General de Residuos Radiactivos. Ministerio para la transición ecológica y el reto demográfico. 2023. Available online: https://www.miteco.gob.es/es/energia/nuclear/residuos/plan-general.html (accessed on 27 December 2023).
  9. Werme, L. Design Premises for Canister for Spent Nuclear Fuel; Posiva SKB Technical Report TR-98-08; Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co.: Stockholm, Sweden, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  10. Bennett, D.G.; Gens, R. Overview of European concepts for high-level waste and spent fuel disposal with special reference waste container corrosion. J. Nucl. Mater. 2008, 379, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jonsson, M.; Emilsson, G.; Emilsson, L. Mechanical design analysis for the canister. Posiva SKB Rep. 2018, 4, 147. [Google Scholar]
  12. Abdelouas, A.; Alonso, U.; Bernier-Latmani, R.; Bosch, C.; Cherkouk, A.; Dobrev, D.; Fernández, A.M.; Finck, N.; Gaggiano, R.; Havlová, V.; et al. Initial State-of-the-Art of WP ConCorD. Final Version as of 17.08.2022 of Deliverable D15.1 of the HORIZON 2020 Project EURAD; EC Grant agreement no: 847593. 2022. Available online: https://www.ejp-eurad.eu/sites/default/files/2022-09/EURAD%20-%20D15.1%20ConCorD%20Initial%20SotA.pdf (accessed on 17 August 2022).
  13. Johnson, L.H.; Niemeyer, M.; Klubertanz, G.; Siegel, P.; Gribi, P. Calculations of the Temperature Evolution of a Repository for Spent Fuel, Vitrified High-Level Waste and Intermediate Level Waste in Opalinus Clay (No. NTB--01-04); National Cooperative for the Disposal of Radioactive Waste (NAGRA): Wettingen, Switzerland, 2002; Volume 80, pp. 1015–2636. [Google Scholar]
  14. Landolt, D.; Davenport, A.; Payer, A.; Shoesmitth, D. A Review of Materials and Corrosion Issues Regarding Canisters for Disposal of Spent Fuel and High-Level Waste in Opalinus Clay; NAGRA Technical Report 09-02; National Cooperative for the Disposal of Radioactive Waste (NAGRA): Wettingen, Switzerland, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  15. Pospiskova, I.; Dobrev, D.; Kouril, M.; Stoulil, J.; Novikova, D.; Kotnour, P.; Matal, O. Czech national programme and disposal canister concept. Corros. Eng. Sci. Technol. 2017, 52 (Suppl. S1), 6–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Prachař, I.; Pospíšková, I.; Vokal, A.; Steinerova, L.; Vondrovic, L. DGR Development in the Czech Republic. Action Plan 2017–2025 (No. SURAO--112-2017); Radioactive Waste Repository Administration: Prague, Czech Republic, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  17. McMurry, J.; Dixon, D.A.; Garroni, J.D.; Ikeda, B.M.; Stroes-Gascoyne, S.; Baumgartner, P.; Melnyk, T.W. Evolution of a Canadian Deep Geologic Repository (No. 06819-REP-01200-10127-R00); Ontario Power Generation Report; Ontario Power Generation: Toronto, ON, Canada, February 2004. [Google Scholar]
  18. Guo, M. The Electrochemical and Corrosion Study of Copper for Nuclear Waste Containers under Deep Geological Disposal Conditions. Ph.D. Thesis, The University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  19. Binns, W.J.; Behazin, M.; Briggs, S.; Keech, P.G. An overview of the Canadian nuclear waste corrosion program. Mater. Corros. 2023, 74, 1580–1586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Dou, W.; Pu, Y.; Han, X.; Song, Y.; Chen, S.; Gu, T. Corrosion of Cu by a sulfate reducing bacterium in anaerobic vials with different headspace volumes. Bioelectrochemistry 2020, 133, 107478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Hall, D.S.; Behazin, M.; Binns, W.J.; Keech, P.G. An evaluation of corrosion processes affecting copper-coated nuclear waste containers in a deep geological repository. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2021, 118, 100766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Mills, M.M.; Sanchez, A.C.; Boisvert, L.; Payne, C.B.; Ho, T.A.; Wang, Y. Understanding smectite to illite transformation at elevated (> 100° C) temperature: Effects of liquid/solid ratio, interlayer cation, solution chemistry and reaction time. Chem. Geol. 2022, 615, 121214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ruiz-Fresneda, M.A.; Fernández-Cantos, M.V.; Gómez-Bolívar, J.; Eswayah, A.S.; Gardiner, P.H.E.; Pinel-Cabello, M.; Solari, P.L.; Merroun, M.L. Combined bioreduction and volatilization of SeVI by Stenotrophomonas bentonitica: Formation of trigonal selenium nanorods and methylated species. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 858, 160030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ruiz-Fresneda, M.A.; Morales-Hidalgo, M.; Povedano-Priego, C.; Jroundi, F.; Hidalgo-Iruela, J.; Cano-Cano, M.; Pérez-Muelas, E.; Merroun, M.L.; Martín-Sanchez, I. Unlocking the key role of bentonite fungal isolates in tellurium and selenium bioremediation and biorecovery: Implications in the safety of radioactive waste disposal. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 912, 169242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. ENRESA. Available online: https://www.enresa.es/.
  26. Cátedra ENRESA. Available online: http://www.catedraenresauco.com/.
  27. Chapman, N. Geological disposal of radioactive wastes–concept, status and trends. J. Iber. Geol. 2006, 32, 7–14. [Google Scholar]
  28. Jonsson, M. Radiation Effects on Materials Used in Geological Repositories for Spent Nuclear Fuel. Int. Sch. Res. Not. 2012, 2012, 639520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Soroka, I.; Chae, N.; Jonsson, M. On the mechanism of γ-radiation-induced corrosion of copper in water. Corros. Sci. 2021, 182, 109279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Spinks, J.W.T.; Woods, R.J. An Introduction to Radiation Chemistry; U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information: Oak Ridge, TN, USA, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  31. Björkbacka, Å.; Yang, M.; Gasparrini, C.; Leygraf, C.; Jonsson, M. Kinetics and mechanisms of reactions between H2O2 and copper and copper oxides. Dalton Trans. 2015, 44, 16045–16051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Reed, D.T.; Konynenburg, R.A.V. Effect of ionizing radiation on moist air systems. MRS Online Proc. Libr. (OPL) 1987, 112, 393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Björkbacka, Å.; Hosseinpour, S.; Johnson, M.; Leygraf, C.; Jonsson, M. Radiation induced corrosion of copper for spent nuclear fuel storage. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2013, 92, 80–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Björkbacka, Å.; Johnson, C.M.; Leygraf, C.; Jonsson, M. Role of the oxide layer in radiation-induced corrosion of copper in anoxic water. J. Phys. Chem. C 2016, 120, 11450–11455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Björkbacka, Å.; Johnson, C.M.; Leygraf, C.; Jonsson, M. Radiation induced corrosion of copper in humid air and argon atmospheres. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2017, 164, C201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Norrfors, K.K.; Björkbacka, Å.; Kessler, A.; Wold, S.; Jonsson, M. γ-radiation induced corrosion of copper in bentonite-water systems under anaerobic conditions. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2018, 144, 8–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. King, F.; Lilja, C.; Pedersen, K.; Pitkänen, P.; Vähänen, M. An Update of the State-of-the-Art Report on the Corrosion of Copper under Expected Conditions in a Deep Geologic Repository (No. SKB-TR--10-67); Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co.: Stockholm, Sweden, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  38. Galamboš, M.; Daňo, M.; Rosskopfová, O.; Šeršeň, F.; Kufčáková, J.; Adamcová, R.; Rajec, P. Effect of gamma-irradiation on adsorption properties of Slovak bentonites. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2012, 292, 481–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Allard, T.; Calas, G. Radiation effects on clay mineral properties. Appl. Clay Sci. 2009, 43, 143–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Strìček, I.; Šucha, V.; Uhlík, P. Gamma-irradiation effects on smectite properties. 4. Mid-European clay conference, Zakopane, Poland. Abstr. Mineral. Spec. Pap. 2008, 33, 157. [Google Scholar]
  41. Strìček, I. Mineral Stability of Bentonites in Barrier Conditions. Ph.D. Thesis, Comenius University in Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovakia, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  42. Plötze, M.; Kahr, G.; Stengele, R.H. Alteration of clay minerals—Gamma-irradiation effects on physico chemical properties. Appl. Clay Sci. 2003, 23, 195–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Allard, T.; Balan, E.; Calas, G.; Fourdrin, C.; Morichon, E.; Sorieul, S. Radiation-induced defects in clay minerals: A review. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B Beam Interact. Mater. At. 2012, 277, 112–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Sorieul, S.; Allard, T.; Wang, L.M.; Grambin-Lapeyre, C.; Lian, J.; Calas, G.; Ewing, R.C. Radiation-Stability of Smectite. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42, 8407–8411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Holmboe, M.; Norrfors, K.K.; Jonsson, M.; Wold, S. Effect of γ-radiation on radionuclide retention in compacted bentonite. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2011, 80, 1371–1377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Gu, B.X.; Wang, L.M.; Minc, L.D.; Ewing, R.C. Temperature Effects on the Radiation Stability and Ion Exchange Capacity of Smectites. J. Nucl. Mater. 2001, 297, 345–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Chikkamath, S.; Manjanna, J.; Kabadagi, A.; Patil, D.; Tripathi, V.S.; Kar, A.S.; Tomar, B.S. Gamma (60Co) irradiation and thermal effect on redox behavior of interlayer iron in montmorillonite. Appl. Clay Sci. 2021, 200, 105893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Van Gerwen, S.J.; Rombouts, F.M.; Van’t Riet, K.; Zwietering, M.H. A data analysis of the irradiation parameter D10 for bacteria and spores under various conditions. J. Food Prot. 1999, 62, 1024–1032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Černá, K.; Bartak, D.S. Online Resource: State of Art—Attachment I to the Work Report 2019, Project Limiting Factors for Survivability and Proliferation of Microorganisms Significant for Corrosion of Deep Geological Repository Barrier Systems (BioBen) Project Number: TAČR TK02010169; 2019. Available online: https://www.surao.cz/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/TZ552_2021.pdf (accessed on 17 August 2022).
  50. Wouters, B.G.; Begg, A.C. Irradiation-induced damage and the DNA damage response. Basic Clin. Radiobiol. 2009, 4, 11–26. [Google Scholar]
  51. Jung, K.W.; Lim, S.; Bahn, Y.S. Microbial radiation-resistance mechanisms. J. Microbiol. 2017, 55, 499–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Mattimore, V.; Battista, J.R. Radioresistance of Deinococcus radiodurans: Functions necessary to survive ionizing radiation are also necessary to survive prolonged desiccation. J. Bacteriol. 1996, 178, 633–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Alper, T.; Howard-Flanders, P. Role of oxygen in modifying the radiosensitivity of E. coli B. Nature 1956, 178, 978–979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Musilova, M.; Wright, G.; Ward, J.M.; Dartnell, L.R. Isolation of radiation-resistant bacteria from Mars analog Antarctic Dry Valleys by preselection, and the correlation between radiation and desiccation resistance. Astrobiology 2015, 15, 1076–1090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Daly, M.J. A new perspective on radiation resistance based on Deinococcus radiodurans. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2009, 7, 237–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Phillips, R.W.; Wiegel, J.; Berry, C.J.; Fliermans, C.; Peacock, A.D.; White, D.C.; Shimkets, L.J. Kineococcus radiotolerans sp. nov., a radiation-resistant, gram-positive bacterium. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2002, 52, 933–938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Bagwell, C.E.; Bhat, S.; Hawkins, G.M.; Smith, B.W.; Biswas, T.; Hoover, T.R.; Saunders, E.; Han, C.S.; Tsodikov, O.V.; Shimkets, L.J. Survival in nuclear waste, extreme resistance, and potential applications gleaned from the genome sequence of Kineococcus radiotolerans SRS30216. PLoS ONE 2008, 3, e3878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Stroes-Gascoyne, S.; Lucht, L.M.; Borsa, J.; Delaney, T.L.; Haveman, S.A.; Hamon, C.J. Radiation resistance of the natural microbial population in buffer materials. MRS Online Proc. Libr. (OPL) 1994, 353, 345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Haynes, H.M.; Pearce, C.I.; Boothman, C.; Lloyd, J.R. Response of bentonite microbial communities to stresses relevant to geodisposal of radioactive waste. Chem. Geol. 2018, 501, 58–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Ojovan, M.I.; Steinmetz, H.J. Approaches to Disposal of Nuclear Waste. Energies 2022, 15, 7804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Marsh, A.I.; Williams, L.G.; Lawrence, J.A. The important role and performance of engineered barriers in a UK geological disposal facility for higher activity radioactive waste. Prog. Nucl. Energy 2021, 137, 103736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Sellin, P.; Leupin, O.X. The use of clay as an engineered barrier in radioactive-waste management—A Review. Clays Clay Miner. 2013, 61, 477–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Svensson, D.; Dueck, A.; Nilsson, U.; Olsson, S.; Sandén, T.; Lydmark, S.; Jägerwall, S.; Pedersen, K.; Hansen, S. Alternative Buffer Material. Status of the Ongoing Laboratory Investigation of Reference Materials and Test Package 1; SKB Report TR-11-06; Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co.: Stockholm, Sweden, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  64. Porras, D.E.V.; Angélica, R.S.; Paz, S.P.A.D. Practical mineralogical quantification of bentonites supported for a PXRD calibrated hkl model. Braz. J. Geol. 2021, 51, e20200088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Chen, B.; Peng, F.; Zhang, L.; Sun, D. Investigation on swelling characteristics of GMZ bentonite with different initial water contents. Ann. Nucl. Energy 2023, 181, 109565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Pedersen, K.; Motamedi, M.; Karnland, O.; Sandén, T. Mixing and sulphate-reducing activity of bacteria in swelling, compacted bentonite clay under high-level radioactive waste repository conditions. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2000, 89, 1038–1047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Rättö, M.; Itävaara, M. Microbial Activity in Bentonite Buffers: Literature Study; VTT Technology; VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland: Espoo, Finland, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  68. Martinez-Moreno, M.F.; Povedano-Priego, C.; Morales-Hidalgo, M.; Mumford, A.D.; Ojeda, J.J.; Jroundi, F.; Merroun, M.L. Impact of compacted bentonite microbial community on the clay mineralogy and copper canister corrosion: A multidisciplinary approach in view of a safe Deep Geological Repository of nuclear wastes. J. Hazard. Mater. 2023, 458, 131940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Martinez-Moreno, M.F.; Povedano-Priego, C.; Mumford, A.D.; Morales-Hidalgo, M.; Mijnendonckx, K.; Jroundi, F.; Ojeda, J.J.; Merroun, M.L. Microbial responses to elevated temperature: Evaluating bentonite mineralogy and copper canister corrosion within the long-term stability of deep geological repositories of nuclear waste. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 915, 170149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Posiva. Safety Functions, Performance Targets and Technical Design Requirements for a KBS-3V Repository—Conclusions and Recommendations from a Joint SKB and Posiva Working Group; Posiva SKB Rep. 01; Posiva: Eurajoki, Finland, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  71. Beaver, R.C.; Vachon, M.A.; Tully, C.S.; Engel, K.; Spasov, E.; Binns, W.J.; Noël, J.J.; Neufeld, J.D. Impact of dry density and incomplete saturation on microbial growth in bentonite clay for nuclear waste storage. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2024, 135, lxae053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Man, M.; Tong, H.; Srikanthan, N.; Usman, M.O.; Tully, C.S.; Noël, J.J.; Behazin, M.; Binns, W.J.; Keech, P.G.; Simpson, M.J. Analysis of natural organic matter chemistry in bentonite clay under compaction using different dry densities and duration. Appl. Geochem. 2024, 166, 105985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Burzan, N.; Murad Lima, R.; Frutschi, M.; Janowczyk, A.; Reddy, B.; Rance, A.; Diomidis, N.; Bernier-Latmani, R. Growth and Persistence of an Aerobic Microbial Community in Wyoming Bentonite MX-80 Despite Anoxic in situ Conditions. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 858324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Maanoja, S.; Palmroth, M.; Salminen, L.; Lehtinen, L.; Kokko, M.; Lakaniemi, A.-M.; Auvinen, H.; Kiczka, M.; Muuri, E.; Rintala, J. The effect of compaction and microbial activity on the quantity and release rate of water-soluble organic matter from bentonites. Appl. Clay Sci. 2021, 211, 106192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Povedano-Priego, C.; Jroundi, F.; Lopez-Fernandez, M.; Shrestha, R.; Spanek, R.; Martín-Sánchez, I.; Villar, M.V.; Ševců, A.; Dopson, M.; Merroun, M.L. Deciphering indigenous bacteria in compacted bentonite through a novel and efficient DNA extraction method: Insights into biogeochemical processes within the Deep Geological Disposal of nuclear waste concept. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 408, 124600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Jalique, D.R.; Stroes-Gascoyne, S.; Hamon, C.J.; Priyanto, D.G.; Kohle, C.; Evenden, W.G.; Wolfaardt, G.M.; Grigoryan, A.A.; McKelvie, J.; Korber, D.R. Culturability and diversity of microorganisms recovered from an eight-year old highly-compacted, saturated MX-80 Wyoming bentonite plug. Appl. Clay Sci. 2016, 126, 245–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Bengtsson, A.; Pedersen, K. Microbial sulphide-producing activity in water saturated Wyoming MX-80, Asha and Calcigel bentonites at wet densities from 1500 to 2000 kgm−3. Appl. Clay Sci. 2017, 137, 203–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Johansson, A.J.; Lilja, C.; Sjögren, L.; Gordon, A.; Hallbeck, L.; Johansson, L. Insights from post-test examination of three packages from the MiniCan test series of copper-cast iron canisters for geological disposal of spent nuclear fuel: Impact of the presence and density of bentonite clay. Corros. Eng. Sci. Technol. 2017, 52, 54–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Gilmour, K.A.; Davie, C.T.; Gray, N. Survival and activity of an indigenous iron-reducing microbial community from MX80 bentonite in high temperature/low water environments with relevance to a proposed method of nuclear waste disposal. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 814, 152660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Liu, D.; Dong, H.; Bishop, M.E.; Zhang, J.; Wang, H.; Xie, S.; Wang, S.; Huang, L.; Eberl, D.D. Microbial reduction of structural iron in interstratified illite-smectite minerals by a sulfate-reducing bacterium. Geobiology 2012, 10, 150–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Zhang, J.; Dong, H.; Liu, D.; Fischer, T.B.; Wang, S.; Huang, L. Microbial reduction of Fe(III) in illite–smectite minerals by methanogen Methanosarcina mazei. Chem. Geol. 2012, 292–293, 35–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Darda, S.A.; Gabbar, H.A.; Damideh, V.; Aboughaly, M.; Hassen, I. A comprehensive review on radioactive waste cycle from generation to disposal. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2021, 329, 15–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Acharya, C. Microbial Bioremediation of Uranium: An Overview; BARC Newsletter: Mumbai, India, 2015; pp. 27–30. [Google Scholar]
  84. Avendaño, R.; Chaves, N.; Fuentes, P.; Sánchez, E.; Jiménez, J.I.; Chavarría, M. Production of selenium nanoparticles in Pseudomonas putida KT2440. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 37155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Povedano-Priego, C.; Jroundi, F.; Solari, P.L.; Guerra-Tschuschke, I.; Abad-Ortega, M.D.M.; Link, A.; Vilchez-Vargas, R.; Merroun, M.L. Unlocking the bentonite microbial diversity and its implications in selenium bioreduction and biotransformation: Advances in deep geological repositories. J. Hazard. Mater. 2023, 445, 130557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Flamíková, D.; Nečas, V. Assessment of the impact of selected changes in the deep geological repository model on its long-term safety. EPJ Web Conf. 2020, 225, 06012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Gao, N.; Huang, Z.; Liu, H.; Hou, J.; Liu, X. Advances on the toxicity of uranium to different organisms. Chemosphere 2019, 237, 124548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Banala, U.K.; Das, N.P.I.; Toleti, S.R. Microbial interactions with uranium: Towards an effective bioremediation approach. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2021, 21, 101254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Lopez-Fernandez, M.; Jroundi, F.; Ruiz-Fresneda, M.A.; Merroun, M.L. Microbial interaction with and tolerance of radionuclides: Underlying mechanisms and biotechnological applications. Microb. Biotechnol. 2021, 14, 810–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Povedano-Priego, C.; Jroundi, F.; Lopez-Fernandez, M.; Sánchez-Castro, I.; Martin-Sánchez, I.; Huertas, F.J.; Merroun, M.L. Shifts in bentonite bacterial community and mineralogy in response to uranium and glycerol-2-phosphate exposure. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 692, 219–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Yu, Q.; Cui, O.; Yu, Q.; Cui, O. Enrichment and remediation of uranium by microorganisms: A review. Open J. Environ. Biol. 2023, 8, 20–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Celik, F.; Camas, M.; Kyeremeh, K.; Sazak Camas, A. Microbial Sorption of Uranium Using Amycolatopsis sp. K47 Isolated from Uranium Deposits. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2018, 229, 112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Lopez-Fernandez, M.; Vilchez-Vargas, R.; Jroundi, F.; Boon, N.; Pieper, D.; Merroun, M.L. Microbial community changes induced by uranyl nitrate in bentonite clay microcosms. Appl. Clay Sci. 2018, 160, 206–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Merroun, M.L.; Raff, J.; Rossberg, A.; Hennig, C.; Reich, T.; Selenska-Pobell, S. Complexation of Uranium by Cells and S-Layer Sheets of Bacillus sphaericus JG-A12. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 71, 5532–5543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Zhao, C.; Liu, J.; Li, X.; Li, F.; Tu, H.; Sun, Q.; Liao, J.; Yang, J.; Yang, Y.; Liu, N. Biosorption and bioaccumulation behavior of uranium on Bacillus sp. dwc-2: Investigation by Box-Behenken design method. J. Mol. Liq. 2016, 221, 156–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Povedano-Priego, C.; Jroundi, F.; Lopez-Fernandez, M.; Morales-Hidalgo, M.; Martin-Sánchez, I.; Huertas, F.J.; Dopson, M.; Merroun, M.L. Impact of anoxic conditions, uranium(VI) and organic phosphate substrate on the biogeochemical potential of the indigenous bacterial community of bentonite. Appl. Clay Sci. 2022, 216, 106331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Ben Ali Gam, Z.; Thioye, A.; Cayol, J.-L.; Joseph, M.; Fauque, G.; Labat, M. Characterization of Desulfovibrio salinus sp. nov., a slightly halophilic sulfate-reducing bacterium isolated from a saline lake in Tunisia. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2018, 68, 715–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Zhou, C.; Vannela, R.; Hyun, S.P.; Hayes, K.F.; Rittmann, B.E. Growth of Desulfovibrio vulgaris When Respiring U(VI) and Characterization of Biogenic Uraninite. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48, 6928–6937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Newsome, L.; Morris, K.; Trivedi, D.; Atherton, N.; Lloyd, J.R. Microbial reduction of uraniumVI in sediments of different lithologies collected from Sellafield. Appl. Geochem. 2014, 51, 55–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Jroundi, F.; Descostes, M.; Povedano-Priego, C.; Sánchez-Castro, I.; Suvannagan, V.; Grizard, P.; Merroun, M.L. Profiling native aquifer bacteria in a uranium roll-front deposit and their role in biogeochemical cycle dynamics: Insights regarding in situ recovery mining. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 721, 137758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Povedano-Priego, C.; Jroundi, F.; Morales-Hidalgo, M.; Pinel-Cabello, M.; Peula-Ruiz, E.; Merroun, M.L.; Martin-Sánchez, I. Unveiling fungal diversity in uranium and glycerol-2-phosphate-amended bentonite microcosms: Implications for radionuclide immobilization within the Deep Geological Repository system. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 908, 168284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Kushwaha, A.; Goswami, L.; Lee, J.; Sonne, C.; Brown, R.J.C.; Kim, K.-H. Selenium in soil-microbe-plant systems: Sources, distribution, toxicity, tolerance, and detoxification. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022, 52, 2383–2420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Wells, M.; McGarry, J.; Gaye, M.M.; Basu, P.; Oremland, R.S.; Stolz, J.F. Respiratory Selenite Reductase from Bacillus selenitireducens Strain MLS10. J. Bacteriol. 2019, 201, 10–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Li, D.-B.; Cheng, Y.-Y.; Wu, C.; Li, W.-W.; Li, N.; Yang, Z.-C.; Tong, Z.-H.; Yu, H.-Q. Selenite reduction by Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 is mediated by fumarate reductase in periplasm. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 3735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Ruiz-Fresneda, M.A.; Martín, J.D.; Bolívar, J.G.; Cantos, M.V.F.; Bosch-Estévez, G.; Moreno, M.F.M.; Merroun, M.L. Green synthesis and biotransformation of amorphous Se nanospheres to trigonal 1D Se nanostructures: Impact on Se mobility within the concept of radioactive waste disposal. Environ. Sci. Nano J. 2018, 5, 2103–2116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Hunter, W.J. Pseudomonas seleniipraecipitans Proteins Potentially Involved in Selenite Reduction. Curr. Microbiol. 2014, 69, 69–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Pinel-Cabello, M.; Chapon, V.; Ruiz-Fresneda, M.A.; Alpha-Bazin, B.; Berthomieu, C.; Armengaud, J.; Merroun, M.L. Delineation of cellular stages and identification of key proteins for reduction and biotransformation of Se(IV) by Stenotrophomonas bentonitica BII-R7. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 418, 126150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Ruiz-Fresneda, M.A.; Gomez-Bolivar, J.; Delgado-Martin, J.; Abad-Ortega, M.D.M.; Guerra-Tschuschke, I.; Merroun, M.L. The Bioreduction of Selenite under Anaerobic and Alkaline Conditions Analogous to Those Expected for a Deep Geological Repository System. Molecules 2019, 24, 3868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Ruiz-Fresneda, M.A.; Eswayah, A.S.; Romero-González, M.; Gardiner, P.H.E.; Solari, P.L.; Merroun, M.L. Chemical and structural characterization of SeIV biotransformations by Stenotrophomonas bentonitica into Se0 nanostructures and volatiles se species. Environ. Sci. Nano J. 2020, 7, 2140–2155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. King, F. Nuclear waste canister materials: Corrosion behavior and long-term performance in geological repository systems. In Geological Repository Systems for Safe Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuels and Radioactive Waste; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK, 2017; pp. 365–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Hall, D.S.; Keech, P.G. An overview of the Canadian corrosion program for the long-term management of nuclear waste. Corros. Eng. Sci. Technol. 2017, 52 (Suppl. S1), 2–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. King, F.; Hall, D.S.; Keech, P.G. Nature of the near-field environment in a deep geological repository and the implications for the corrosion behaviour of the container. Corros. Eng. Sci. Technol. 2017, 52 (Suppl. S1), 25–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Hultquist, G. Hydrogen evolution in corrosion of copper in pure water. Corros. Sci. 1986, 26, 173–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Little, B.J.; Hinks, J.; Blackwood, D.J. Microbially influenced corrosion: Towards an interdisciplinary perspective on mechanisms. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2020, 154, 105062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Enning, D.; Garrelfs, J. Corrosion of iron by sulfate-reducing bacteria: New views of an old problem. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2014, 80, 1226–1236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Thauer, R.K.; Stackebrandt, E.; Hamilton, W.A. Energy metabolism and phylogenetic diversity of sulphate-reducing bacteria. In Sulphate-Reducing Bacteria; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2007; pp. 1–38. [Google Scholar]
  117. Huttunen-Saarivirta, E.; Rajala, P.; Carpén, L. Corrosion behaviour of copper under biotic and abiotic conditions in anoxic groundwater: Electrochemical study. Electrochim. Acta 2016, 203, 350–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Marshall, M.H.; Simpson, M.J. State of Science Review: Natural Organic Matter in Clays and Groundwater; NWMO TR-2014-05; Nuclear Waste Management Organization: Toronto, ON, Canada, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  119. King, F.; Kolář, M. Lifetime predictions for nuclear waste disposal containers. Corrosion 2019, 75, 309–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Martino, T.; Chen, J.; Guo, M.; Ramamurthy, S.; Shoesmith, D.W.; Noël, J.J. Comments on E. Huttunen-Saarivirta et al., “Kinetic Properties of the Passive Film on Copper in the Presence of Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria” [J. Electrochem. Soc., 165, C450 (2018)]. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2019, 166, Y13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. SKB. Supplementary Information on Canister Integrity Issues; Technical Report SKB TR-19-15; SKB: Stockholm, Sweden, 2019; 135p. [Google Scholar]
  122. Qin, Z.; Daljeet, R.; Ai, M.; Farhangi, N.; Noël, J.J.; Ramamurthy, S.; Shoesmith, D.; King, F.; Keech, P. The active/passive conditions for copper corrosion under nuclear waste repository environment. Corros. Eng. Sci. Technol. 2017, 52 (Suppl. S1), 45–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Smith, J.M.; Wren, J.C.; Odziemkowski, M.; Shoesmith, D.W. The electrochemical response of preoxidized copper in aqueous sulfide solutions. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2007, 154, C431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. West, J.M.; McKinley, I.G.; Stroes-Gascoyne, S. Microbial effects on waste repository materials. Radioact. Environ. 2002, 2, 255–277. [Google Scholar]
  125. Giroud, N.; Tomonaga, Y.; Wersin, P.; Briggs, S.; King, F.; Vogt, T.; Diomidis, N. On the fate of oxygen in a spent fuel emplacement drift in Opalinus Clay. Appl. Geochem. 2018, 97, 270–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Wersin, P.; Johnson, L.H.; McKinley, I.G. Performance of the bentonite barrier at temperatures beyond 100 °C: A critical review. Phys. Chem. Earth Parts A/B/C 2007, 32, 780–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Grandia, F.; Domènech, C.; Arcos, D.; Duro, L. Assessment of the Oxygen Consumption in the Backfill. Geochemical Modelling in a Saturated Backfill (No. SKB-R--06-106); Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co.: Stockholm, Sweden, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  128. Crusset, D.; Deydier, V.; Necib, S.; Gras, J.M.; Combrade, P.; Feron, D.; Burger, E. Corrosion of carbon steel components in the French high-level waste program: Evolution of disposal concept and selection of materials. Corros. Eng. Sci. Technol. 2017, 52, 17–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Lapuerta, S.; Bérerd, N.; Moncoffre, N.; Millard-Pinard, N.; Jaffrézic, H.; Crusset, D.; Féron, D. The Influence of Relative Humidity on Iron Corrosion under Proton Irradiation. J. Nucl. Mater. 2008, 375, 80–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Wendling, J.; Justinavicius, D.; Sentis, M.; Amaziane, B.; Bond, A.; Calder, N.J.; Treille, E. Gas transport modelling at different spatial scales of a geological repository in clay host rock. Environ. Earth Sci. 2019, 78, 221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Liu, J.F.; Wu, Y.; Cai, C.Z.; Ni, H.Y.; Cao, X.L.; Pu, H.; Song, S.-B.; Pu, S.-Y.; Skoczylas, F. Investigation into water retention and gas permeability of Opalinus clay. Environ. Earth Sci. 2018, 77, 213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Croisé, J.; Mayer, G.; Talandier, J.; Wendling, J. Impact of water consumption and saturation-dependent corrosion rate on hydrogen generation and migration from an intermediate-level radioactive waste repository. Transp. Porous Media 2011, 90, 59–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Perko, J.; Weetjens, E. Thermohydraulic analysis of gas generation in a disposal facility for vitrified high-level radioactive waste in boom clay. Nucl. Technol. 2011, 174, 401–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Enssle, C.P.; Brommundt, J.; Kaempfer, T.U.; Mayer, G.; Wendling, J. Full-scale 3D modelling of a nuclear waste repository in the Callovo-Oxfordian clay. Part 2: Thermo-hydraulic two-phase transport of water, hydrogen, 14C and 129I. In Clays in Natural and Engineered Barriers for Radioactive Waste Confinement, Special Publications; Norris, S., Bruno, J., Cathelineau, M., Delage, P., Fairhurst, C., Gaucher, E.C., Höhn, E.H., Kalinichev, A., Lalieux, P., Sellin, P., Eds.; Geological Society: London, UK, 2014; Volume 400, pp. 469–481. [Google Scholar]
  135. O’Brien, K.E.; Rainham, D.; O’Beirne-Ryan, A.M. Using field analogue soil column experiments to quantify radon-222 gas migration and transport through soils and bedrock of Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada. Environ. Earth Sci. 2014, 72, 2607–2620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Libert, M.; Bildstein, O.; Esnault, L.; Jullien, M.; Sellier, R. Molecular hydrogen: An abundant energy source for bacterial activity in nuclear waste repositories. Phys. Chem. Earth Parts A/B/C 2011, 36, 1616–1623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Vikman, M.; Marjamaa, K.; Nykyri, M.; Small, J.S.; Miettinen, H.; Heikinheimo, L.; Haavisto, T.; Itävaara, M. The biogeochemistry of gas generation from low-level nuclear waste: Microbiological characterization during 18 years study under in situ conditions. Appl. Geochem. 2019, 105, 55–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Peitzsch, M.; Kremer, D.; Kersten, M. Microfungal alkylation and volatilization of selenium adsorbed by goethite. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44, 129–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Poller, A.; Mayer, G.; Darcis, M.; Smith, P. Modelling of Gas Generation in Deep Geological Repositories after Closure (No. NTB--16-04); National Cooperative for the Disposal of Radioactive Waste (NAGRA): Wettingen, Switzerland, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  140. Lopez-Fernandez, M.; Broman, E.; Simone, D.; Bertilsson, S.; Dopson, M. Statistical analysis of community RNA transcripts between organic carbon and geogas-fed continental deep biosphere groundwaters. MBio 2019, 10, 10-1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Rajala, P.; Bomberg, M. Geomicrobes: Life in terrestrial deep subsurface, volume II. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1169127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Mehrshad, M.; Lopez-Fernandez, M.; Sundh, J.; Bell, E.; Simone, D.; Buck, M.; Bernier-Latmani, R.; Bertilsson, E.; Dopson, M. Energy efficiency and biological interactions define the core microbiome of deep oligotrophic groundwater. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 4253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Lau, M.C.; Kieft, T.L.; Kuloyo, O.; Linage-Alvarez, B.; Van Heerden, E.; Lindsay, M.R.; Guo, L.; Perlman, D.H.; Kyin, S.; Shwe, H.H.; et al. An oligotrophic deep-subsurface community dependent on syntrophy is dominated by sulfur-driven autotrophic denitrifiers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, E7927–E7936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Nazina, T.N.; Luk’yanova, E.A.; Zakharova, E.V.; Ivoilov, V.S.; Poltaraus, A.B.; Kalmykov, S.N.; Belyaev, S.S.; Zubkov, A.A. Distribution and activity of microorganisms in the deep repository for liquid radioactive waste at the Siberian chemical combine. Microbiology 2006, 75, 727–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Kale, R.C.; Ravi, K. A review on the impact of thermal history on compacted bentonite in the context of nuclear waste management. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2021, 23, 101728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Tan, Ö.; Yılmaz, L.; Zaimoğlu, A.S. Variation of some engineering properties of clays with heat treatment. Mater. Lett. 2004, 58, 1176–1179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Sun, Q.; Zhang, W.; Qian, H. Effects of high temperature thermal treatment on the physical properties of clay. Environ. Earth Sci. 2016, 75, 610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Lingnau, B.E.; Graham, J.; Yarechewski, D.; Tanaka, N.; Gray, M.N. Effects of temperature on strength and compressibility of sand-bentonite buffer. Eng. Geol. 1996, 41, 103–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Estabragh, A.R.; Khosravi, F.; Javadi, A.A. Effect of thermal history on the properties of bentonite. Environ. Earth Sci. 2016, 75, 657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Kaufhold, S.; Dohrmann, R. Stability of bentonites in salt solutions: II. Potassium chloride solution—Initial step of illitization. Appl. Clay Sci. 2010, 49, 98–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Ohazuruike, L.; Lee, K.J. A comprehensive review on clay swelling and illitization of smectite in natural subsurface formations and engineered barrier systems. Nucl. Eng. Technol. 2023, 55, 1495–1506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Payer, J.H.; Finsterle, S.; Apps, J.A.; Muller, R.A. Corrosion performance of engineered barrier system in deep horizontal drillholes. Energies 2019, 12, 1491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Stoulil, J.; Pavlova, L.; Kouřil, M. Localised corrosion of stainless steels 316L and 2205 in synthetic bentonite pore water and bentonite slurry. Acta Metall. Slovaca 2019, 25, 24–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Schlegel, M.L.; Necib, S.; Daumas, S.; Labat, M.; Blanc, C.; Foy, E.; Linard, Y. Corrosion at the carbon steel-clay borehole water interface under anoxic alkaline and fluctuating temperature conditions. Corros. Sci. 2018, 136, 70–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Nešić, S. Key issues related to modelling of internal corrosion of oil and gas pipelines—A review. Corros. Sci. 2007, 49, 4308–4338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Ruiz-Fresneda, M.A.; Martinez-Moreno, M.F.; Povedano-Priego, C.; Morales-Hidalgo, M.; Jroundi, F.; Merroun, M.L. Impact of microbial processes on the safety of deep geological repositories for radioactive waste. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1134078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Bartak, D.; Bedrníková, E.; Kašpar, V.; Říha, J.; Hlaváčková, V.; Večerník, P.; Šachlová, K.; Černá, K. Survivability and proliferation of microorganisms in bentonite with implication to radioactive waste geological disposal: Strong effect of temperature and negligible effect of pressure. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2024, 40, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  158. Grigoryan, A.A.; Jalique, D.R.; Medihala, P.; Stroes-Gascoyne, S.; Wolfaardt, G.M.; McKelvie, J.; Korber, D.R. Bacterial diversity and production of sulfide in microcosms containing uncompacted bentonites. Heliyon 2018, 4, e00722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  159. Masurat, P.; Eriksson, S.; Pedersen, K. Evidence of indigenous sulphate-reducing bacteria in commercial Wyoming bentonite MX-80. Appl. Clay Sci. 2010, 47, 51–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Laskowska, E.; Kuczyńska-Wiśnik, D. New insight into the mechanisms protecting bacteria during desiccation. Curr. Genet. 2020, 66, 313–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. A Spanish bentonite block compacted at a dry density of 1.7 g cm−3. Heatmap of the relative abundance of the samples at genus level in triplicate (duplicates in StB.eD, B, and B.eD). Cut-off: 0.5% of r.a. Different colors show the relative abundance of each genus (the warmer the color, the greater relative abundance). Data from Martinez-Moreno et al. (2023) [68].
Figure 1. A Spanish bentonite block compacted at a dry density of 1.7 g cm−3. Heatmap of the relative abundance of the samples at genus level in triplicate (duplicates in StB.eD, B, and B.eD). Cut-off: 0.5% of r.a. Different colors show the relative abundance of each genus (the warmer the color, the greater relative abundance). Data from Martinez-Moreno et al. (2023) [68].
Microorganisms 12 01025 g001
Figure 2. High-angle annular dark-field scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM-HAADF) images of thin sections of Amycolatopsis ruanii cells treated with uranium and glycerol-2-phosphate (G2P) showing U-P deposits at cell wall level (arrow), extra- (asterisk) and intracellular (dashed arrow) uranium phosphates (A,E), and their corresponding EDX maps with the distribution of P (C,G), U (D,H), and P + U (B,F). Bar scale: 500 nm (A); 800 nm (BD); 100 nm (EH). Figure from Povedano-Priego et al. [90].
Figure 2. High-angle annular dark-field scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM-HAADF) images of thin sections of Amycolatopsis ruanii cells treated with uranium and glycerol-2-phosphate (G2P) showing U-P deposits at cell wall level (arrow), extra- (asterisk) and intracellular (dashed arrow) uranium phosphates (A,E), and their corresponding EDX maps with the distribution of P (C,G), U (D,H), and P + U (B,F). Bar scale: 500 nm (A); 800 nm (BD); 100 nm (EH). Figure from Povedano-Priego et al. [90].
Microorganisms 12 01025 g002
Figure 3. VP-FESEM images illustrating the Se transformation from a-Se nanospheres to t-Se nanowires, with an intermediate step of m-Se aggregates by using proteins as a template. The images correspond to samples prepared by growing Stenotrophomonas bentonitica anaerobically. Scale bars: 100 nm (A,B,E,F), 200 nm (C), and 20 nm (D). Yellow arrow in (A): a-Se nanospheres; yellow arrow in (E,F): t-Se nanowires. Figure from Ruiz-Fresneda et al. [108].
Figure 3. VP-FESEM images illustrating the Se transformation from a-Se nanospheres to t-Se nanowires, with an intermediate step of m-Se aggregates by using proteins as a template. The images correspond to samples prepared by growing Stenotrophomonas bentonitica anaerobically. Scale bars: 100 nm (A,B,E,F), 200 nm (C), and 20 nm (D). Yellow arrow in (A): a-Se nanospheres; yellow arrow in (E,F): t-Se nanowires. Figure from Ruiz-Fresneda et al. [108].
Microorganisms 12 01025 g003
Figure 4. Diagrammatic representation of the evolution of the near-field environment for a repository. Modified from [110].
Figure 4. Diagrammatic representation of the evolution of the near-field environment for a repository. Modified from [110].
Microorganisms 12 01025 g004
Figure 5. Schematic representation of chemical microbially induced corrosion (CMIC) of copper by sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB).
Figure 5. Schematic representation of chemical microbially induced corrosion (CMIC) of copper by sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB).
Microorganisms 12 01025 g005
Table 1. Information on DGR models to be followed by each company representing the main countries involved in the management of high-level nuclear waste.
Table 1. Information on DGR models to be followed by each company representing the main countries involved in the management of high-level nuclear waste.
CountryCompanyCanisterBufferBuffer Density (g/cm3)Host RockAbsorbed Dose at the Surface (Gy/h)Temperature at the Surface (°C)References
SpainENRESACarbon steelBentonite1.65Clay/GraniteNot determined<100[7,8]
FinlandPOSIVACopper + cast ironBentonite1.55Crystalline0.33~90[9,10,11]
SwedenSKBCopper + cast ironBentonite1.6Crystalline0.2~90[10,12]
SwitzerlandNAGRA Carbon steelBentonite>1.45Opalinus clay<0.035<150[10,13,14]
FranceANDRACarbon steelnone-Granite<10~90[10,12]
Czech RepublicSÚRAOCarbon steel Bentonite1.4Crystalline0.3<95[12,15,16]
BelgiumONDRAF-NIRASCarbon steelCement/c-Boom clay25~95[10,12]
CanadaNWMOCarbon steel coated with copperBentonite1.6Crystalline/sedimentary2<100[17,18,19]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Morales-Hidalgo, M.; Povedano-Priego, C.; Martinez-Moreno, M.F.; Ruiz-Fresneda, M.A.; Lopez-Fernandez, M.; Jroundi, F.; Merroun, M.L. Insights into the Impact of Physicochemical and Microbiological Parameters on the Safety Performance of Deep Geological Repositories. Microorganisms 2024, 12, 1025. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12051025

AMA Style

Morales-Hidalgo M, Povedano-Priego C, Martinez-Moreno MF, Ruiz-Fresneda MA, Lopez-Fernandez M, Jroundi F, Merroun ML. Insights into the Impact of Physicochemical and Microbiological Parameters on the Safety Performance of Deep Geological Repositories. Microorganisms. 2024; 12(5):1025. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12051025

Chicago/Turabian Style

Morales-Hidalgo, Mar, Cristina Povedano-Priego, Marcos F. Martinez-Moreno, Miguel A. Ruiz-Fresneda, Margarita Lopez-Fernandez, Fadwa Jroundi, and Mohamed L. Merroun. 2024. "Insights into the Impact of Physicochemical and Microbiological Parameters on the Safety Performance of Deep Geological Repositories" Microorganisms 12, no. 5: 1025. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12051025

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop